Both the SOCs of Mediatek that is Dimensity 1000 and Dimensity 1000 Plus are recently launched and both the chipsets are equipped with 5G capabilities. Now we have compared Dimensity 1000 vs Dimensity 1000 Plus processors on the basis of pros and cons, Geekbench, Antutu, and technical specifications.
CPU Performance
Gaming Performance
Battery Life
Tenzys Tech Score
Contents
- 1 Major differences between Dimensity 1000 Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus
- 2 Full comparison between Dimensity 1000 vs Dimensity 1000 Plus
- 3 Gaming Performance
- 4 Antutu 9
- 5 GeekBench 5
- 6 CPU
- 7 Graphics
- 8 Memory
- 9 Multimedia (ISP)
- 10 Connectivity
- 11 Info
- 12 Review by Tenzys Tech
- 13 FAQ
- 14 What new Samsung Exynos 1280 chipset has to offer
- 15 New MacBooks may be released with M2 processor later this year
- 16 Dimensity 8100, 8000 and 1300 announced by MediaTek and debut with smartphones in March
Major differences between Dimensity 1000 Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus
Pros of Dimensity 1000 Plus
- Higher Antutu 9 benchmark of Dimensity 1000 Plus by ~29.76% (572739 vs 441370).
- Instruction set is latest hence better.
- Latest Chipset launched 6 months later than Dimensity 1000.
- Dimensity 1000 Plus has 49.76% higher upload speed than Dimensity 1000 (316 vs 211 Mbps).
Full comparison between Dimensity 1000 vs Dimensity 1000 Plus
| SoC: | Mediatek Dimensity 1000 | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ |
Gaming Performance
| PUBG Mobile | – | 45 FPS [Ultra] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | – | 55 FPS [High] |
| Fortnite | – | 28 FPS [Medium] |
| Shadowgun Legends | – | 58 FPS [Ultra] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | – | 56 FPS [Ultra] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | – | 59 FPS [Ultra] |
Antutu 9
Total Score:
| CPU | 141266 | 154856 |
| GPU | 146104 | 212559 |
| Memory | 84463 | 89293 |
| UX | 69537 | 116031 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-core Score
| Image compression | – | 176.7 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 28.2 images/s | |
| Speech recognition | – | 45.6 words/s |
| Machine learning | – | 46.9 images/s |
| Camera shooting | – | 28.9 images/s |
| HTML 5 | – | 3.53 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | – | 857.5 Krows/s |
CPU
| Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2600 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A |
| L1 cache | – | – |
| L2 cache | – | – |
| L3 cache | – | 52 KB |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MP9 | Mali-G77 MC9 + HyperEngine 2.0 |
| Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 9 | 9 |
| Shading units | 144 | 144 |
| FLOPS | 800 Gigaflops | – |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 29.87 Gbit/s | 29.87 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 3.0 | MediaTek APU 3.0 |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 80MP, 2x 32MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Integrated 5G Modem | Integrated 5G Modem |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | 5G Band- Up to 4.7 Gbps, LTE – Up to 1.2 Gbps | 5G Band- Up to 4.7 Gbps, LTE- Up to 1.2 Gbps |
| Upload speed | 5G Band- Up to 2.5 Gbps, LTE- Up to 211 Mbps | 5G Band- Upto 2.5Gbps, LTE- Up to 316 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
Info
| Announced | November 2019 | May 2020 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | MT6889 | MT6889Z/CZA |
| Official page | MediaTek Dimensity 1000 official site | MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus official site |
Review by Tenzys Tech
CPU
The CPUs of both Dimensity 1000 and Dimensity 1000 Plus are clocked up to 2.6 GHz with four big cortex A77 core setup and 4 cortex A55 core setup.
Memory
The storage type in Dimensity 1000 is UFS 3.0 while in Dimensity 1000 Plus it is UFS 2.1 which means Dimensity 1000 has a fast and better storage type than Dimensity 1000 plus because UFS 3.1 has a fast read and write speed than UFS 2.1.
MediaTek Dimensity 1000
Summary
Overall Good chipset in Flagship Series.
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
Summary
A decent performer in Flagship Series.
FAQ
Q1. Which is better Dimensity 1000 or Dimesity 1000 Plus?
Ans. Dimensity 1000 and Dimensity 1000 Plus both the SoCs are mostly similar apart from some factors like Storage type in dimensity 1000 is UFS 3.1 and in Snapdragon 1000+ is UFS 2.1. Apart from it, the instruction set is the latest and the Upload speed is higher in Dimensity 1000+. While in conclusion, the Antutu score is higher of Dimensity 1000 Plus as compared to Dimensity 1000. So usually Dimensity 1000 plus is better as compared to Dimensity 1000.
Q2. Which is the best MediaTek processor?
Ans. Recently, Dimensity 1200 is the best and latest flagship-level processor available by MediaTek.
Also Read:
