Mediatek | Dimensity 920 vs Snapdragon 695 | Dimensity 920 vs Sd 695 | Qualcomm
We have collected a comprehensive comparison of the Dimensity 920 vs Snapdragon 695 SoCs, which were released by Mediatek and Qualcomm, respectively. We’ve now weighed the benefits and downsides of these two 8-core CPUs, as well as their Geekbench, Antutu, and technical characteristics.
CPU Performance
Gaming Performance
Battery Life
Tenzys Tech Score
Major differences between Dimensity 920 Vs Snapdragon 695
Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 920
- Memory frequency of Dimensity 920 is 50.02% higher than Snapdragon 695 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
- Dimensity 920 shows 34.23% better AnTuTu 9 score (498 vs 371K).
- Dimensity 920 has a 13.63% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 695 (2500 vs 2200 MHz).
- Peak Download Speed of Dimensity 920 is 10.8% higher than Snapdragon 695 (2.77 vs 2.5 Gbps).
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
- Peak Upload Speed of Snapdragon 695 is 25% higher than Dimensity 920 (1500 vs 1200 Mbps).
- Optimization for gaming by developers is more often for snapdragon processors as compared to dimensity processors.
Full comparison between Dimensity 920 vs Snapdragon 695
| SoC: | Dimensity 920 | Snapdragon 695 |
Antutu 9
Total Score:
| CPU | 139277 | 115765 |
| GPU | 128453 | 93638 |
| Memory | 96272 | 60715 |
| UX | 134315 | 101282 |
Also Checkout: Dimensity 1200 vs Snapdragon 780G
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | – | 111.3 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | – | 16.9 images/s |
| Speech recognition | – | 28.8 words/s |
| Machine learning | – | 26.7 images/s |
| Camera shooting | – | 15.9 images/s |
| HTML 5 | – | 2.25 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | – | 579.5 Krows/s |
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | – | – |
| Graphics test | 11 FPS | – |
| Score | 2003 | – |
Also Read: Snapdragon 780G vs Snapdragon 768G
Display
| Max On-Device Display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | FHD+ @ 120 Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max External Display | – | – |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Color Depth | Up to 10-bit | Up to 10-bit |
| Color Gamut | Rec2020 | Rec2020 |
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A77) 6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | – | – |
| L2 cache | – | – |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | – |
| Process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Transistor Count | 12 Billion | – |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | – |
| Execution units | 4 | – |
| Shading units | 64 | – |
| FLOPS | 684 Gigaflops | – |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | – | 17 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 16 GB | – |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 3.0 | Hexagon 686 |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Also Read: Snapdragon 730G vs Snapdragon 720G
Connectivity
| Modem | – | Snapdragon X51 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | 2770 Mbps (5G), 1200 Mbps (4G) | 2500 Mbps (5G), 800 Mbps (4G) |
| Peak Upload speed | 1200 Mbps (5G), 316 Mbps (4G) | 1500 (5G), 210 Mbps (4G) |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | August 2021 | October 2021 |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Model number | MT6877T | SM6375 |
| Official page | MediaTek Dimensity 920 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site |
Additional
| Charging | NA | Qualcomm® Quick Charge™ 4+ technology |
Review by Tenzys Tech
CPU
The CPU of the Mediatek Dimensity 920 is clocked at 2.5 GHz while the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 is only clocked up to 2.2 GHz. Because of this, the Dimensity 920 offers a higher performance improvement due to its excessive overclocking and is hence a better alternative than the Snapdragon 695.
GPU
The MediaTek Dimensity 920 has a Mali-G68 MC4 GPU based on 5nm technology, whereas the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 has an Adreno 619 based on 8nm lithography. To be honest, Mali-G68 MC4 is a far superior GPU to Adreno 619.
Memory
The memory frequency of the Mediatek Dimensity 920 is 3200 MHz, while the memory frequency of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 is 2133 MHz. Furthermore, the memory type of the Dimensity 920 is LPDDR5, whereas the memory type of the Snapdragon 695 is LPDDR4x, implying that the Dimensity 920 has superior memory speed and energy efficiency than the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695.
Energy efficiency and battery life
As the facts are seen by the technical specifications of both the SoCs, the Dimensity 920 is built on 6nm process technology while on other hand, Snapdragon 695 is also built on 6nm technology but the TDP of Snapdragon 695 is 6 watt which is comparatively lesser than Dimensity 920. This concludes that Dimensity 920 consumes more energy than Snapdragon 695 which will decrease the battery more frequently in Dimensity 920 chipset. Hence Snapdragon 695 is more energy-efficient than Dimensity 920.
MediaTek Dimensity 920
Summary
A Decent 5G chipset by Mediatek for Mid-Range smartphones.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
Summary
A Decent 5G chipset by Qualcomm for Mid-Range smartphones.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Dimensity processor is best for gaming?
When compared to current Android flagship handsets, the Dimensity 9000 uses the Arm Mali-G710 MC10 graphics processor, which provides a 35 percent increase in gaming performance and a 60 percent increase in battery efficiency.
Also Read:
Your mode of explaining everything in this post is truly fastidious, every one be capable of simply be aware of it, Thanks a lot.
You’re most welcome dear and thanks for your valuable feedback.
Your reviews are very much detailed and concise. Thank you