Dimensity 1200 vs Kirin 9000 | Dimensity 1200 vs Kirin 9000
We have arranged a full comparison of Dimensity 1200 vs Kirin 9000 where these SoCs are launched by Mediatek and Hisilicon respectively. Now we have compared these two 8 core processors on the basis of their pros and cons, Geekbench, Antutu, and technical specifications.
CPU Performance
Gaming Performance
Battery Life
Tenzys Tech Score
Contents
- 1 Major differences between Dimensity 1200 vs Kirin 9000
- 2 Full comparison between Dimensity 1200 vs Kirin 9000
- 3 Gaming Performance
- 4 Antutu 9
- 5 GeekBench 5
- 6 3DMark
- 7 Display
- 8 CPU
- 9 Graphics
- 10 Memory
- 11 Multimedia (ISP)
- 12 Connectivity
- 13 Info
- 14 Additional
- 15 Review by Tenzys Tech
- 16 What new Samsung Exynos 1280 chipset has to offer
- 17 New MacBooks may be released with M2 processor later this year
- 18 Dimensity 8100, 8000 and 1300 announced by MediaTek and debut with smartphones in March
Major differences between Dimensity 1200 vs Kirin 9000
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1200
- GPU frequency of Dimensity 1200 is 30.76% higher as compared to Kirin 9000 (850 vs 650 MHz).
- Memory frequency of Dimensity 1200 is 55.12% higher than Kirin 9000 (4266 vs 2750 MHz).
Pros of Hisilicon Kirin 9000
- Kirin 9000 shows 8.07% better AnTuTu 9 score (722428 vs 668463).
- Kirin 9000 has a 4.33% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 1200 (3130 vs 3000 MHz).
- Peak Download Speed of Kirin 9000 is 38.29% higher than Dimensity 1200 (6.5 vs 4.7 Gbps).
- Kirin 9000 has a 28.57% smaller size transistor (5 nm versus 6 nm).
- Optimization for gaming by developers is more often for Snapdragon processors as compared to Dimensity processors.
Full comparison between Dimensity 1200 vs Kirin 9000
| SoC: | Dimensity 1200 | Kirin 9000 |
Gaming Performance
| Games | FPS(Frames Per Second) | FPS(Frames Per Second) |
|---|---|---|
| Fortnite Mobile | 28.8 | 27.3 |
| PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 71.4 | 83.9 |
| Garena Free Fire – The Cobra | 98.5 | 50.6 |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 55.5 | 46.4 |
| Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 61.6 | 71.3 |
| Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 89.5 | 103.1 |
| Real Racing 3 | 197 | 88.6 |
| Sniper 3D | 216.7 | 65.8 |
| Need for Speed No Limits | 157.6 | 60.7 |
| Mortal Kombat X | 157.6 | 65.8 |
| CSR Racing 2 | 137.9 | 60.7 |
Antutu 9
Total Score:
| CPU | 170589 | 187157 |
| GPU | 233643 | 266823 |
| Memory | 118786 | 131949 |
| UX | 145445 | 136499 |
Also Checkout: Dimensity 1200 vs Snapdragon 780G
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 171.75 Mpixels/s | – |
| Face detection | 32.25 images/s | – |
| Speech recognition | 51.5 words/s | – |
| Machine learning | 51.65 images/s | – |
| Camera shooting | 27.35 images/s | – |
| HTML 5 | 3.76 Mnodes/s | – |
| SQLite | 931.9 Krows/s | – |
3DMark
| Stability | 93% | 56% |
| Graphics test | 25 FPS | 36 FPS |
| Score | 4179 | 6036 |
Display
| Max On-Device Display | Full HD+ @ 168 Hz | WQHD @ 90 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Max External Display | 4K @ 60 Hz | – |
| HDR | HDR10+, HDR10 | HDR10+ |
| Color Depth | Up to 10-bit | Up to 10-bit |
| Color Gamut | Rec2020 | Rec2020 |
CPU
| Architecture | 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2050 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3130 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | – |
| L2 cache | 320 KB | – |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| Process | 6 nanometers | 5 nanometers |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Transistor Count | – | 15.3 Billion |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G78 MP24 |
| Architecture | Valhall | Valhall 2 |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 9 | 24 |
| Shading units | 144 | 384 |
| FLOPS | – | 2372 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 4266 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 29 Gbit/s | 44 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Neural Processor |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 128MP, 2x 64MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Also Read: Snapdragon 730G vs Snapdragon 720G
Connectivity
| Modem | – | Balong 5000 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 19 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | 4.7 Gbps | 6.5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload speed | 2.5 Gbps | – |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | January 2021 | October 2020 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | MT6893 | – |
| Official page | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 official site | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 official site |
Additional
| Charging | NA | NA |
Review by Tenzys Tech
CPU
CPU of Dimensity 1200 is clocked up to 3.0 GHz with updated Cortex A78 cores while Kirin 9000 is clocked up to 3.13 GHz with Cortex A77 older cores which makes MediaTek’s Dimesnity 1200 a better chipset than Hisilicon Kirin 9000.
GPU
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 is equipped with Mali-G77 MC9 GPU with only 9 cores and 7nm fabrication while the Kirin 9000 is equipped with Mali-G78 MP24 with enough 24 cores and 5nm fabrication. So Frankly, Mali-G78 MP24 is a much better GPU than Mali-G77 MC9 GPU. Also Read: Snapdragon 780G vs Snapdragon 768G
Memory
The memory frequency of Dimensity 1200 is 4266 MHz while in Kirin 9000 it is 2750 MHz. But the memory type of Dimensity 1200 is LPDDR4x while the memory type of Kirin 9000 is LPDDR5 which means memory speed is better in Dimensity 1200 while the energy efficiency of memory is better in Kirin 9000.
Display
In-display section, Dimensity 1200 supports display up to 2520 x 1080 resolution with 168Hz refresh rate while display resolution in Kirin 9000 supports up to 3840 x 2160 with 144 Hz refresh rate only. So there is a tough competition between the screen comparison between Dimensity 1200 vs Kirin 9000. So, it’s up to you which one you can prefer. Let us know in the comment box which one you can prefer.
Energy efficiency and battery life
As the facts are seen by the technical specifications of both the SoCs, the Kirin 9000 is built on 5nm process technology while on other hand Dimensity 1200 is built on 6nm technology. This concludes that Hisilicon Kirin 9000 is better than Dimensity 1200 as the small size semiconductor indicates the more no. of transistors embedded in SOC (System On Chip) which is not only energy efficient but also significantly enhances the performance of the chipset.
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
Summary
Overall a good chipset in a flagship series.
Hisilicon Kirin 9000
Summary
The best flagship performer by Huawei till 2021.
Also Read:
