Mediatek | Dimensity 900 vs Snapdragon 695 | Dimensity 900 vs Sd 695 | Qualcomm
We have collected a comprehensive comparison of the Dimensity 900 vs Snapdragon 695 SoCs, which were released by Mediatek and Qualcomm, respectively. We’ve now weighed the benefits and downsides of these two 8-core CPUs, as well as their Geekbench, Antutu, and technical characteristics.
CPU Performance
Gaming Performance
Battery Life
Tenzys Tech Score
Contents
- 1 Major differences between Dimensity 900 Vs Snapdragon 695
- 2 Full comparison between Dimensity 900 vs Snapdragon 695
- 3 Antutu 9
- 4 GeekBench 5
- 5 3DMark
- 6 Display
- 7 CPU
- 8 Graphics
- 9 Memory
- 10 Multimedia (ISP)
- 11 Connectivity
- 12 Info
- 13 Additional
- 14 Review by Tenzys Tech
- 15 Frequently Asked Questions
- 16 What new Samsung Exynos 1280 chipset has to offer
- 17 New MacBooks may be released with M2 processor later this year
- 18 Dimensity 8100, 8000 and 1300 announced by MediaTek and debut with smartphones in March
Major differences between Dimensity 900 Vs Snapdragon 695
Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 900
- Memory frequency of Dimensity 900 is 50.02% higher than Snapdragon 695 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
- Dimensity 900 shows 13.74% better AnTuTu 9 score (422 vs 371K).
- Dimensity 900 has a 9.09% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 695 (2400 vs 2200 MHz).
- Peak Download Speed of Dimensity 900 is 10.8% higher than Snapdragon 695 (2.77 vs 2.5 Gbps).
- Dimensity 900 has 8.23% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 695 (18.4 vs 17 Gbit/s).
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
- Peak Upload Speed of Snapdragon 695 is 25% higher than Dimensity 900 (1500 vs 1200 Mbps).
- Optimization for gaming by developers is more often for snapdragon processors as compared to dimensity processors.
Full comparison between Dimensity 900 vs Snapdragon 695
| SoC: | Dimensity 900 | Snapdragon 695 |
Antutu 9
Total Score:
| CPU | 115686 | 115765 |
| GPU | 119156 | 93638 |
| Memory | 80995 | 60715 |
| UX | 106823 | 101282 |
Also Checkout: Dimensity 1200 vs Snapdragon 780G
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 124.75 Mpixels/s | – |
| Face detection | 19.6 images/s | – |
| Speech recognition | 37.75 words/s | – |
| Machine learning | 33.35 images/s | – |
| Camera shooting | 19.25 images/s | – |
| HTML 5 | 2.28 Mnodes/s | – |
| SQLite | 650.5 Krows/s | – |
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 99% | – |
| Graphics test | 12 FPS | – |
| Score | 2019 | – |
Also Read: Mediatek Dimensity 810 vs Dimensity 700
Display
| Max On-Device Display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | FHD+ @ 120 Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max External Display | – | – |
| HDR | HDR10+ | HDR10 |
| Color Depth | Up to 10-bit | Up to 10-bit |
| Color Gamut | Rec2020 | Rec2020 |
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A77) 6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | – | – |
| L2 cache | – | – |
| L3 cache | – | – |
| Process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Transistor Count | 10 Billion | – |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | – |
| Execution units | 4 | – |
| Shading units | 48 | – |
| FLOPS | 684 Gigaflops | – |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 18.4 Gbit/s | 17 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 16 GB | – |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 3.0 | Hexagon 686 |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Also Read: MediaTek Helio G95 vs Dimensity 700
Connectivity
| Modem | – | Snapdragon X51 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | 2770 Mbps (5G), 1200 Mbps (4G) | 2500 Mbps (5G), 800 Mbps (4G) |
| Peak Upload speed | 1200 Mbps (5G), 211 Mbps Mbps (4G) | 1500 (5G), 210 Mbps (4G) |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | May 2021 | October 2021 |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Model number | MT6877 | SM6375 |
| Official page | MediaTek Dimensity 900 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site |
Additional
| Charging | NA | Qualcomm® Quick Charge™ 4+ technology |
Review by Tenzys Tech
CPU
The Mediatek Dimensity 900’s CPU is clocked at 2.4 GHz, but the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 is only clocked at 2.2 GHz. As a result of its severe overclocking, the Dimensity 900 delivers a larger performance gain and is thus a superior choice to the Snapdragon 695.
GPU
The Mali-G68 MC4 GPU in the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is based on 5nm technology, but the Adreno 619 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 is based on 8nm lithography. To be honest, the Mali-G68 MC4 GPU outperforms the Adreno 619.
Memory
The Mediatek Dimensity 900 has a memory frequency of 3200 MHz, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 has a memory frequency of 2133 MHz. Furthermore, the Dimensity 900’s memory type is LPDDR5, whereas the Snapdragon 695’s memory type is LPDDR4x, meaning that the Dimensity 900 has greater memory speed and energy efficiency than the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695.
Energy efficiency and battery life
According to the technical specs of both SoCs, the Dimensity 900 is constructed on 6nm process technology, while the Snapdragon 695 is also built on 6nm technology, but the TDP of Snapdragon 695 is 6 watt, which is considerably less than Dimensity 900. This means that the Dimensity 900 chipset consumes more energy than the Snapdragon 695 chipset, causing the battery to drain more often in the Dimensity 900 chipset. As a result, the Snapdragon 695 consumes less energy than the Dimensity 900.
MediaTek Dimensity 900
Summary
A Decent 5G chipset by Mediatek for Mid-Range smartphones.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
Summary
A Decent 5G chipset by Qualcomm for Mid-Range smartphones.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Dimensity 900 a good processor?
The Dimensity 900 microprocessor is designed for mid-range smartphones that will have 5G connectivity. Let’s take a closer look at its interior specifications. The soc has an octa-core CPU with two Arm Cortex-A78 processors running at up to 2.4GHz and six Arm Cortex-A55 cores running at up to 2GHz.
Based on a high-performance 6nm fabrication node, it also integrates Wi-Fi 6, FHD+ 120Hz screens, and a 108MP primary camera for an all-around fantastic experience. The Dimensity 900 chipset has a 5G New Radio (NR) sub-6GHz modem with carrier aggregation and bandwidth capability up to 120MHz.
Also Read:
