Mediatek Helio G95 vs Dimensity 700
We’ve compiled a full comparison of Mediatek’s recently introduced Helio G95 vs Dimensity 700 SoCs. We’ve now examined the advantages and disadvantages of these two 8-core CPUs, as well as their Geekbench, Antutu, and technical specifications.
CPU Performance
Gaming Performance
Battery Life
Tenzys Tech Score
Contents
- 1 Major differences between Helio G95 vs Dimensity 700
- 2 Full comparison between Helio G95 vs Dimensity 700
- 3 Antutu 9
- 4 GeekBench 5
- 5 3DMark
- 6 Gaming
- 7 Display
- 8 CPU
- 9 Graphics
- 10 Memory
- 11 Multimedia (ISP)
- 12 Connectivity
- 13 Info
- 14 Review by Tenzys Tech
- 15 Frequently Asked Questions
- 16 What new Samsung Exynos 1280 chipset has to offer
- 17 New MacBooks may be released with M2 processor later this year
- 18 Dimensity 8100, 8000 and 1300 announced by MediaTek and debut with smartphones in March
Major differences between Helio G95 vs Dimensity 700
Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 700
- Dimensity 700 has a 7.31% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 700 (2200 vs 2050 MHz).
- Dimensity 700 has a smaller-sized transistor (7 nm versus 12 nm).
- Dimensity 700 shows 0.59% better AnTuTu 9 score (336 vs 334K).
- Dimensity 700 has 5.55% higher GPU Frequency (950 vs 900 MHz).
- Has 24.10% better floating-point computation (243 vs 195.8 Gigaflops).
- Have 5G connectivity.
Full comparison between Helio G95 vs Dimensity 700
| SoC: | Helio G95 | Dimensity 700 |
Antutu 9
Total Score:
| CPU | 95615 | 98632 |
| GPU | 85900 | 71777 |
| Memory | 54379 | 72555 |
| UX | 98554 | 93594 |
Also Checkout: Dimensity 1200 vs Snapdragon 870
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 98 Mpixels/s | 101.85 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 14.4 images/s | 15 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 30.5 words/s | 32.9 words/s |
| Machine learning | 26.4 images/s | 27.9 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 13.7 images/s | 14.55 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 1.93 Mnodes/s | 2.1 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 500.3 Krows/s | 543.4 Krows/s |
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 98% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 8 FPS | 6 FPS |
| Score | 1350 | 1097 |
Also Read: Snapdragon 8 gen 1 vs Snapdragon 780g
Gaming
| Games | FPS(Frames Per Second) | FPS(Frames Per Second) |
| PUBG Mobile | 51 | 51 |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 38 | 37 |
| Fortnite | 27 | 25 |
| Shadowgun Legends | 57 | 59 |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 48 | 52 |
| Genshin Impact | 27 | 34 |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 52 | 56 |
Display
| Max On-Device Display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | FHD+ @ 90Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max External Display | – | QHD @ 60Hz |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Color Depth | Up to 10-bit | Up to 10-bit |
| Color Gamut | Rec2020 | Rec2020 |
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2050 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | – | – |
| L2 cache | – | – |
| L3 cache | – | – |
| Process | 12 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor Count | – | – |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 2 |
| Shading units | 64 | 32 |
| FLOPS | 195.8 Gigaflops | 243 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | – | 17.07 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 10 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Da Vinci | Yes |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC |
Also Read: Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Dimensity 9000
Connectivity
| Modem | – | – |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | 600 Mbps (4G) | 2770 Mbps (5G), 1200 Mbps (4G) |
| Peak Upload speed | 150 Mbps (4G) | 500 Mbps (5G), 211 Mbps (4G) |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | September 2020 | November 2020 |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Model number | MT6785V/CD | MT6833V/ZA |
| Official page | MediaTek Helio G95 official site | MediaTek Dimensity 700 official site |
Review by Tenzys Tech
CPU
The CPU of the Mediatek Helio g95 is clocked at 2.05 GHz, while the Mediatek Dimensity 700 is clocked up to 2.2 GHz, and both the SoCs have the same Cortex A76 cores. Because of enhanced overclocking, the Dimensity 700 offers a higher performance improvement and is hence a better alternative than the Helio g95.
GPU
Based on the specifications of both the GPUs i.e. Mali-G76 3EEMC4 and Mali-G57 MC2 of Helio g95 and Dimensity 700 respectively, there is no huge difference between the graphical units but based on the number of cores and clock-speed we can conclude that Helio g95 has 4 core GPU but has lesser clock-speed of 900 MHz while Dimensity 700 has only GPU of only 2 cores but have enhanced clock-speed of 950 MHz. But real-time performance, Dimensity 700 is better as compared to Helio g95.
Energy efficiency and battery life
As the facts are seen by the technical specifications of both the SoCs, the Helio g95 is built on 12nm process technology while on other hand, Dimensity 700 is built on 7nm technology. This concludes that Dimensity 700 is better than Helio g95 as the small size semiconductor indicates the more number of transistors embedded in SOC (System On Chip) which is not only energy efficient but also significantly enhances the performance of the chipset.
Mediatek Helio G95
Summary
Designed for mid-range series of 4g smartphones.
Mediatek Dimensity 700
Summary
Based on 7nm lithography and designed for 5G mid-range smartphones.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
Which is better MediaTek Helio G95 or Dimensity 700?
Dimensity 700 and Helio G95 are the mid-range SoCs and based on technical specifications, Dimensity 700 has a 2200 MHz clock speed big core while Helio g95 has 2050 MHz only. Other than that dimensity 700 has a better GPU that is Mali-G57 with a clock speed of 950 MHz while Helio G95 has an ARM Mali G76 3EEMC4 GPU with a clock speed of 900 MHz only. Other than that Dimensity 700 is a 5G chipset whereas Helio g95 is limited to 4G. So dimensity 700 is the best SoC as compared to Helio G95.
-
Does Helio G95 support 5G?
The 5G connection is not supported by the Helio G95 CPU. The Helio G95 uses the same network infrastructure as the Helio G90T because it is a totally revamped Helio G90T. Only 4G LTE networks are supported by the G95. As a result, when compared to Dimensity or Snapdragon 5G chipsets, it is not futureproofed.
Also Read:
