Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Snapdragon 690 | Sd 678 vs Sd 690
We have collected a comprehensive comparison of the Snapdragon 678 vs Snapdragon 690 SoCs, which were recently released by Qualcomm. We’ve now weighed the benefits and downsides of these two 8-core CPUs, as well as their Geekbench, Antutu, and technical characteristics.
CPU Performance
Gaming Performance
Battery Life
Tenzys Tech Score
Major differences between Snapdragon 678 vs Snapdragon 690
Pros of Mediatek Snapdragon 678
- Snapdragon 678 has a 10% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 690 (2200 vs 2000 MHz).
- Snapdragon 678 is the latest SoC as launched 6 months later than Snapdragon 690.
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
- Snapdragon 690 has 14.30% higher speed memory (RAM) than Snapdragon 678 (2133 vs 1866 MHz).
- Snapdragon 690 has 12.42% higher GPU frequency (950 vs 845 MHz).
- Snapdragon 690 shows 23.21% better AnTuTu 9 score (345K vs 280k).
- Snapdragon 690 has a smaller-sized transistor (6 nm versus 11 nm).
- The instruction set is the latest, hence better.
Full comparison between Snapdragon 678 vs Snapdragon 690
| SoC: | Snapdragon 678 | Snapdragon 690 |
Antutu 9
Total Score:
| CPU | 101216 | 110385 |
| GPU | 51346 | 76645 |
| Memory | 48181 | 63724 |
| UX | 82701 | 94636 |
Also Checkout: Kirin-9000 vs Apple a15 bionic
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 102.2 Mpixels/s | 111.3 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 14.5 images/s | 16.9 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 27.8 words/s | 28.8 words/s |
| Machine learning | 23.7 images/s | 26.7 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 13.7 images/s | 15.9 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 2.05 Mnodes/s | 2.25 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 527.2 Krows/s | 579.5 Krows/s |
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 99% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| Score | 482 | 811 |
Gaming Benchmark
| Games | FPS | FPS |
|---|---|---|
| PUBG Mobile | – | 41 FPS |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | – | 40 FPS |
| Fortnite | – | 24 FPS |
| Shadowgun Legends | – | 54 FPS |
| World of Tanks Blitz | – | 59 FPS |
| Genshin Impact | – | 14 FPS |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | – | 48 FPS |
Also Read: Dimensity 1000 vs Dimensity 1000 plus
Display
| Max On-Device Display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | FHD+ @ 120 Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max External Display | – | QHD @ 60Hz |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Color Depth | Up to 10-bit | Up to 10-bit |
| Color Gamut | Rec2020 | Rec2020 |
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) 6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 460 Silver (Cortex-A55) | 2x 2 GHz – Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77) 6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 560 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1700 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | – |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | – |
| L3 cache | – | – |
| Process | 11 nanometers | 8 nanometers |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Transistor Count | 12 Billion | – |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 612 | Adreno 619L |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 845 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 2 |
| Shading units | 96 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 354 Gigaflops | – |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 14.9 Gbit/s | 14.9 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 685 | Hexagon 692 |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 25MP | 1x 192MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Also Read: Dimensity 1200 vs Snapdragon 768g
Connectivity
| Modem | X12 | X51 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | – (5G), 600 Mbps (4G) | 2500 Mbps (5G), 1200 Mbps (4G) |
| Peak Upload speed | – (5G), 150 Mbps (4G) | 900 Mbps (5G), 210 Mbps (4G) |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | December 2020 | June 2020 |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Model number | SM6150-AC | SM6350 |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 official site |
Additional
| Charging | Qualcomm® Quick Charge™ 4+ technology | Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ technology Qualcomm Quick Charge AI |
Review by Tenzys Tech
CPU
The CPU of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 is clocked at 2.2 GHz, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 is only clocked at 2.0 GHz, but the Snapdragon 678 has an outdated Cortex A76 core while Snapdragon 690 have updated Cortex A77 cores. Because of enhanced or updated cores, the snapdragon 690 offers a higher performance improvement and is hence a better alternative than the Snapdragon 678.
GPU
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 has an Adreno 612 GPU based on 14nm technology with 845 MHz frequency, whereas the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 has an Adreno 619L and is based on 8nm lithography with 950 MHz frequency. To be honest, Adreno 619L is a far superior GPU to Adreno 612 in terms of fabrication technology and overclocking.
Energy efficiency and battery life
As the facts are seen by the technical specifications of both the SoCs, the Snapdragon 678 is built on 11nm process technology while on other hand, Snapdragon 690 is built on 8nm technology. This concludes that Snapdragon 678 is better than Snapdragon 690 as the small size semiconductor indicates the more no. of transistors embedded in SOC (System On Chip) which is not only energy efficient but also significantly enhances the performance of the chipset.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
Summary
The average SoC in the 6th series of Qualcomm Snapdragon processors for budget-range of smartphones.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
Summary
A Decent 5G chipset by Qualcomm for Mid-Range smartphones.
Also Read:
