Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 690 | Sd 695 vs Sd 690
We have collected a comprehensive comparison of the Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 690 SoCs, which were recently released by Qualcomm. We’ve now weighed the benefits and downsides of these two 8-core CPUs, as well as their Geekbench, Antutu, and technical characteristics.
Tenzys Tech Score
- 1 Major differences between Snapdragon 695 Vs Snapdragon 690
- 2 Full comparison between Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 690
- 3 Antutu 9
- 4 GeekBench 5
- 5 3DMark
- 6 Display
- 7 CPU
- 8 Graphics
- 9 Memory
- 10 Multimedia (ISP)
- 11 Connectivity
- 12 Info
- 13 Additional
- 14 Review by Tenzys Tech
- 15 What new Samsung Exynos 1280 chipset has to offer
- 16 New MacBooks may be released with M2 processor later this year
- 17 Dimensity 8100, 8000 and 1300 announced by MediaTek and debut with smartphones in March
Major differences between Snapdragon 695 Vs Snapdragon 690
Pros of Mediatek Snapdragon 695
- Snapdragon 695 has a smaller-sized transistor (6 nm versus 8 nm).
- Snapdragon 695 shows 14.78% better AnTuTu 9 score (396 vs 345K).
- Snapdragon 695 has 14.09% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 690 (17 vs 14.9 Gbit/s)
- Snapdragon 695 has a 10% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 690 (2200 vs 2000 MHz).
- Peak Upload Speed of Snapdragon 695 is 66.66% higher than Snapdragon 690 (1500 vs 900 Mbps).
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
- Instructon set is better in Snapdragon 690 as compared to Snapdragon 690.
Full comparison between Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 690
|SoC:||Snapdragon 695||Snapdragon 690|
Also Checkout: Kirin-9000 vs Apple a15 bionic
|Image compression||–||111.3 Mpixels/s|
|Face detection||–||16.9 images/s|
|Speech recognition||–||28.8 words/s|
|Machine learning||–||26.7 images/s|
|Camera shooting||–||15.9 images/s|
|HTML 5||–||2.25 Mnodes/s|
3DMark Wild Life Performance
|Graphics test||–||4 FPS|
Also Read: Dimensity 1000 vs Dimensity 1000 plus
|Max On-Device Display||FHD+ @ 120Hz||FHD+ @ 120 Hz|
|Max On-Display Resolution||2520 x 1080||2520 x 1080|
|Max External Display||–||QHD @ 60Hz|
|Color Depth||Up to 10-bit||Up to 10-bit|
|Architecture||2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)|
6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
|2x 2 GHz – Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77)|
6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 560 Silver (Cortex-A55)
|Base Frequency||1700 MHz||1700 MHz|
|2200 MHz||2000 MHz|
|Process||6 nanometers||8 nanometers|
|Transistor Count||12 Billion||–|
|GPU name||Adreno 619||Adreno 619L|
|Architecture||Adreno 600||Adreno 600|
|GPU frequency||–||950 MHz|
|Memory frequency||2133 MHz||2133 MHz|
|Bus||2x 16 Bit||2x 16 Bit|
|Max bandwidth||17 Gbit/s||14.9 Gbit/s|
|Max size||–||8 GB|
|Neural processor (NPU)||Hexagon 686||Hexagon 692|
|Storage type||eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2||eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0|
|Max display resolution||2520 x 1080||2520 x 1080|
|Max camera resolution||1x 108MP, 2x 16MP||1x 192MP, 2x 16MP|
|Video capture||1K at 60FPS||4K at 30FPS|
|Video playback||1080p at 60FPS||4K at 30FPS|
|Video codecs||H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9||H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9|
|Audio codecs||AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV||AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV|
Also Read: Dimensity 1200 vs Snapdragon 768g
|4G support||LTE Cat. 18||LTE Cat. 18|
|Peak Download speed||2500 Mbps (5G), 800 Mbps (4G)||2500 Mbps (5G), 1200 Mbps (4G)|
|Peak Upload speed||1500 (5G), 210 Mbps (4G)||900 Mbps (5G), 210 Mbps (4G)|
|Navigation||GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC||GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC|
|Announced||October 2021||June 2020|
|Official page||Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site||Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 official site|
|Charging||Qualcomm® Quick Charge™ 4+ technology||Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ technology|
Qualcomm Quick Charge AI
Review by Tenzys Tech
The CPU of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 is clocked at 2.2 GHz, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 is only clocked at 2.0 GHz, and both the SoCs have different cores which are Cortex A78 and Cortex A77 cores respectively. So, due to updated cores in Snapdragon 695, it makes it better than Snapdragon 690 in performance criteria.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 has an Adreno 619 GPU based on 8nm technology, whereas the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 has an Adreno 619L and is also based on 8nm lithography. To be honest, Adreno 619 is a far superior GPU to Adreno 619L.
The memory frequency of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 is 2133 MHz, while the memory frequency of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 is 1866 MHz. Furthermore, it implies that the Snapdragon 695 has superior memory speed than the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690.
Energy efficiency and battery life
As the facts are seen by the technical specifications of both the SoCs, the Snapdragon 695 is built on 6nm process technology while on other hand, Snapdragon 690 is built on 8nm technology. This concludes that Snapdragon 695 is better than Snapdragon 690 as the small size semiconductor indicates the more no. of transistors embedded in SOC (System On Chip) which is not only energy efficient but also significantly enhances the performance of the chipset.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
The superior SoC in the 6th series of Qualcomm Snapdragon processors for Mid-Range smartphones.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
A Decent 5G chipset by Qualcomm for Mid-Range smartphones.