Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Apple A15 Bionic | SD 8 Gen 1 vs Apple A15 Bionic
We have arranged a full comparison of Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Apple A15 Bionic where Qualcomm and Apple launch these SoCs respectively. Now we have compared these two 8 core processors based on their pros and cons, Geekbench, Antutu, and technical specifications.
CPU Performance
Gaming Performance
Battery Life
Tenzys Tech Score
Contents
- 1 Major differences between Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Apple A15 Bionic
- 2 Full comparison between Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Apple A15 Bionic
- 3 Antutu 9
- 4 GeekBench 5
- 5 3D Mark
- 6 Display
- 7 CPU
- 8 Graphics
- 9 Memory
- 10 Multimedia (ISP)
- 11 Connectivity
- 12 Info
- 13 Additional
- 14 Review by Tenzys Tech
- 15 Frequently Asked Questions
- 16 What new Samsung Exynos 1280 chipset has to offer
- 17 New MacBooks may be released with M2 processor later this year
- 18 Dimensity 8100, 8000 and 1300 announced by MediaTek and debut with smartphones in March
Major differences between Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Apple A15 Bionic
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 has 8 cores while Apple A15 Bionic has 6 cores.
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 has a 24.84% higher Antutu 9 score than the Apple A15 Bionic (1000k vs 801k).
- Smaller-sized transistors in Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 as compared to Apple A15 Bionic (4nm vs 5nm).
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is the latest SOC as announced 3-months later than the Apple A15 Bionic.
- Instruction set is latest as compared to the Apple A15 Bionic, hence better.
Pros of Apple A15 Bionic
- Apple A15 Bionic has a 7.43% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (3223 vs 3000 MHz).
- Apple A15 Bionic has a 33.31% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4266 vs 3200 MHz).
Also Read: Snapdragon 732g vs Snapdragon 730g
Full comparison between Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Apple A15 Bionic
| SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Apple A15 Bionic |
Antutu 9
Total Score:
| CPU | 228047 | 216265 |
| GPU | 428067 | 339795 |
| Memory | 175864 | 112472 |
| UX | 171611 | 133063 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
3D Mark
| Stability | – | 80% |
| Graphics test | – | 57 FPS |
| Score | — | 9594 |
Display
| Max On-Device Display | 4K @ 60 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz | 4K, QHD+ |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2732 x 2048 |
| Max External Display | 4K @ 60 Hz | – |
| HDR | HDR10+, HDR10 | HDR10+, HDR10 |
| Color Depth | Up to 10-bit | Up to 10-bit |
| Color Gamut | Rec2020 | Rec2020 |
CPU
| Architecture | 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510 | 2x 3.223 GHz – Avalanche 4x 1.82 GHz – Blizzard |
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Base Frequency | 1800 MHz | 1820 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3223 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.5-A |
| L1 cache | – | – |
| L2 cache | – | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | – | – |
| Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| TDP | – | 6 Watt |
| Transistor Count | – | 15 billion |
Also Read: Snapdragon 870 vs Snapdragon 750G
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 730 | Apple A15 GPU 5-Core |
| Architecture | Adreno 700 | ARM |
| GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Execution units | 3 | 5 |
| Shading units | 768 | 640 |
| FLOPS | – | – |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | – |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | – |
| DirectX version | 12 | – |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | – |
| Max bandwidth | – | 42.7 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Neural Engine |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | NVMe |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2732 x 2048 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 64MP | – |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+ |
Connectivity
| Modem | Snapdragon X65 | – |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | 10 Gbps | – |
| Peak Upload speed | – | – |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
Info
| Announced | December 2021 | September 2021 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | SM8450 | APL1W07 |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 official site | – |
Additional
| Charging | Qualcomm Quick Charge 5 technology Qualcomm Quick Charge AI(0-100% in less than 15 minutes) | – |
Also Read: Snapdragon 888 vs Snapdragon 888 Plus
Review by Tenzys Tech
CPU
The CPU of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is clocked up to 3 GHz while Apple A15 Bionic chip is clocked up to 3.223 GHz. However, Apple A15 Bionic chip has 6 Cores(Hexa-core) while Snapdragon 888 Plus has 8 cores(octa-core). But on the basis of CPU configurations, we can’t judge the real-time performance because both SoCs operate on different OS or platforms (Apple- IOS, Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Android).
GPU
GPU of chipset Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is equipped with Adreno 730 while the Apple A15 Bionic Chip is equipped with Apple A15 GPU 5-Core. Frankly, Apple A15 GPU is much better than Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 because Apple’s GPU has a clock speed of 1.2 GHz while Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is clocked up to 800 MHz.
Memory
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is equipped with the most recent LPDDR5 quad-channel RAM at 3200 MHz and a maximum supported capacity of 24 GB on another hand, the Apple a15 Bionic has LPDDR4x Dual-channel RAM at a frequency of 4266 MHz and only supports 8 GB RAM. So, from the energy efficiency point of view, Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is better while to the point of RAM speed, Apple A15 Bionic is better.
Energy efficiency and battery life
The Snapdragon 8 gen 1 is built on 4 nm lithography, whereas the Apple a15 Bionic SoC is built on 5 nm manufacturing technology. This means that the Snapdragon 8 gen 1 is more power-efficient than the Apple a15 Bionic because the smaller size semiconductor indicates a greater number of transistors embedded in the SoC (System on Chip), which does not only save energy but also significantly improves the chipset’s overall performance.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Summary
Advanced and latest flagship Chipset by Qualcomm for the flagships phones of 2022.
Apple A15 Bionic
Summary
The best and latest SoC was launched by Apple in September 2021.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does iPhone only have 4 GB RAM?
iPhones do not require terabytes of RAM to function correctly because they do not run Android. When opposed to Android’s Java VM Garbage Collection, iOS is a Unix-based platform that employs ARC (automatic reference counting), which is far more efficient in allocating and deallocating memory as needed.
Why is Apple’s chip faster than Qualcomm’s?
It depends on two factors:
Budget: Apple manufactures its own chips to meet their specific requirements. They can construct anything they need, and because there is no middleman, it pays to employ their own designs when selling in huge quantities. They can invest the extra funds in a larger, more powerful chip. Other firms have a limit budget for such parts that they are ready to spend. Qualcomm, for example, must create solutions that are appealing to a wide range of manufacturers.
Design: Apple’s chip design team is highly regarded and is regarded as the finest in the world by many in the industry. Most Android phones, including Qualcomm, employ standard ARM reference designs in their cores. If they want a quicker processor, all they have to do is add more cores. That’s excellent for multi-processing-aware routines, but many workloads necessitate a quick single core. JavaScript apps are a prime illustration of this. Apple licenses the ARM instruction set but develops its own cores. As a result, Apple has the quickest ARM-based processors.
Also Read:
