Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 9000: Reviews and Benchmarks | Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 9000
We have arranged a full comparison of Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 9000 which are launched by Samsung and MediaTek respectively. Now we have compared these two 8 core processors based on their pros and cons, Geekbench, Antutu, and technical specifications.
CPU Performance
Gaming Performance
Battery Life
Tenzys Tech Score
Contents
- 1 Major differences between Exynos 2200 Vs Dimensity 9000
- 2 Full comparison between Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 9000
- 3 Antutu 9
- 4 GeekBench 5
- 5 Display
- 6 CPU
- 7 Graphics
- 8 Memory
- 9 Multimedia (ISP)
- 10 Connectivity
- 11 Info
- 12 Review by Tenzys Tech
- 13 Frequently Asked Questions
- 14 What new Samsung Exynos 1280 chipset has to offer
- 15 New MacBooks may be released with M2 processor later this year
- 16 Dimensity 8100, 8000 and 1300 announced by MediaTek and debut with smartphones in March
Major differences between Exynos 2200 Vs Dimensity 9000
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
- Exynos 2200 is the latest SOC as announced 2-months later than Dimensity 9000.
- Exynos 2200 has a 52.94% higher GPU frequency than Dimensity 9000 (1300 vs 850 MHz).
- Has 46.8% higher peak upload speed (3.67 vs 2.5 Gbps).
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- Dimensity 9000 has 5.38% higher Antutu 9 score than Exynos 2200 (1017 vs 970k).
- Has 2.04% higher peak download speed (7.5 vs 7.35 Gbps).
Full comparison between Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 9000
| SoC: | Exynos 2200 | Dimensity 9000 |
Antutu 9
Total Score:
| CPU | 231679 | 256987 |
| GPU | 412728 | 393810 |
| Memory | 161800 | 186890 |
| UX | 164423 | 179801 |
Also Read: Dimensity 920 vs Snapdragon 690
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Also Read: Exynos 2100 vs Snapdragon 870
Display
| Max On-Device Display | 4K @ 120 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz | 4K @ 60 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2960 x 1440 |
| Max External Display | 4K @ 60 Hz | 4K @ 60 Hz |
| HDR | HDR10+, HDR10 | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, Dolby Vision |
| Color Depth | Up to 10-bit | Up to 10-bit |
| Color Gamut | Rec2020 | Rec2020 |
CPU
| Architecture | 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510 | 1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3050 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv9-A |
| L1 cache | – | 1024 KB |
| L2 cache | – | 3.5 MB |
| L3 cache | – | 8 MB |
| Process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| TDP | – | – |
| Transistor Count | – | – |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Mali-G710 |
| Architecture | – | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | – | 10 |
| Shading units | – | 512 |
| FLOPS | – | 1174 GFlops |
| Memory bus | – | – |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 3750 MHz |
| Bus | – | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | – | 60 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | – |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Dual-core NPU and DSP | Yes |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2960 x 1440 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC |
Connectivity
| Modem | – | – |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | 7.35 Gbps (5G), 3 Gbps (4G) | 7.5 Gbps (5G) |
| Peak Upload speed | 3.67 Gbps (5G), 422 Mbps (4G) | 2.5 Gbps (5G) |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | January 2022 | November 2021 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | s5e9925 | MT6983 |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 2200 official site | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 official site |
Also Read: Exynos 1080 vs Snapdragon 870
Review by Tenzys Tech
CPU
However, while discussing the various CPUs, clock speed is not just the metric on which it is based, but it also includes the core generation employed in that specific SoC. Keeping this in mind, the clock speed of Samsung’s Exynos 2200 has not yet been officially verified, but it comes with upgraded cores, one of which is cortex x2, which is the successor to cortex X1 utilized in the Exynos 2100 and has a clock speed of 2.9 GHz. Another three medium cortex A710 cores run at 2.5 GHz, while four Cortex A510 power efficiency cores run at 1.8 GHz.
The MediaTek Dimensity 9000, on the other hand, is equipped with a single high-performance Cortex X2 processor clocked at 3.05 GHz. Another three medium Cortex A710 cores run at 2.85 GHz, while four energy-efficient Cortex A510 cores run at 1.8 GHz. So, based on the enhanced cores, MediaTek’s Dimensity 9000 outperforms the medium cortex A710 overclocked version and the Exynos 2200.
GPU
The Exynos 2200‘s GPU is a Samsung Xclipse 920 with a clock speed of 1300 GHz. Dimensity 9000, on the other hand, is outfitted with the Mali-G710, which has a clock speed of just 850 MHz. So, based on their setup, it is concluded that Exynos 2200 is superior to Exynos 2200.
Energy efficiency and battery life
According to the specifications, the Exynos 2200 is built on 4 nm lithography, while the Dimensity 9000 is likewise based on 4 nm manufacturing technology. This means that both SoCs consume the same amount of power.
Samsung Exynos 2200
Summary
Advanced and latest flagship Chipset by Samsung for the flagship phones of 2022.
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Summary
Mediatek’s latest and flagship processor launched in Q4 of 2021.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Exynos 2200 is better than Dimensity 9000?
The performance of Exynos 2200 lags behind the Dimensity 9000 due to their Antutu Scores which are 965874 and 1017488 respectively. However, the GPU of Exynos 2200 outperforms with 1300 MHz frequency as of 850 MHz of Dimensity 9000. So, there is no doubt that in the graphical intensive task Exynos 2200 is a better option. While overall comparison of both the SoCs indicates the better option towards Dimensity 9000.
Also Read:
