Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 870: Reviews and Benchmarks | Exynos 2200 vs Sd 870 | Qualcomm
We have arranged a full comparison of Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 870 which are launched by Samsung and Qualcomm respectively. Now we have compared these two 8 core processors based on their pros and cons, Geekbench, Antutu, and technical specifications.
CPU Performance
Gaming Performance
Battery Life
Tenzys Tech Score
Contents
- 1 Major differences between Exynos 2200 Vs Snapdragon 870
- 2 Full comparison between Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 870
- 3 Antutu 9
- 4 GeekBench 5
- 5 3DMark
- 6 Display
- 7 CPU
- 8 Graphics
- 9 Memory
- 10 Multimedia (ISP)
- 11 Connectivity
- 12 Info
- 13 Review by Tenzys Tech
- 14 Frequently Asked Questions
- 15 What new Samsung Exynos 1280 chipset has to offer
- 16 New MacBooks may be released with M2 processor later this year
- 17 Dimensity 8100, 8000 and 1300 announced by MediaTek and debut with smartphones in March
Major differences between Exynos 2200 Vs Snapdragon 870
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
- Exynos 2200 is the latest SOC as announced 12-months later than Snapdragon 870.
- Exynos 2200 has a 101.55% higher GPU frequency than Snapdragon 870 (1300 vs 645 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 50.62% higher Antutu 9 score than Snapdragon 870 (970 vs 644k).
- Has 22.33% higher peak upload speed (3.67 vs 3 Gbps).
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
- Snapdragon 870 has 6.66% higher CPU frequency than Exynos 2200 (3200 vs 3000 MHz).
- Has 2.04% higher peak download speed (7.5 vs 7.35 Gbps).
Also Checkout: Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 9000
Full comparison between Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 870
| SoC: | Exynos 2200 | Snapdragon 870 |
Antutu 9
Total Score:
| CPU | 231679 | 179347 |
| GPU | 412728 | 270188 |
| Memory | 161800 | 98761 |
| UX | 164423 | 95818 |
Also Read: Dimensity 920 vs Snapdragon 690
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
3DMark
| Stability | – | 90% |
| Graphics test | – | 25 FPS |
| Score | – | 4258 |
Also Read: Exynos 2100 vs Snapdragon 870
Display
| Max On-Device Display | 4K @ 120 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz | 4K @ 60 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Max External Display | 4K @ 60 Hz | 4K @ 60 Hz |
| HDR | HDR10+, HDR10 | HDR10+, HDR10 |
| Color Depth | Up to 10-bit | Up to 10-bit |
| Color Gamut | Rec2020 | Rec2020 |
CPU
| Architecture | 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510 | 1x 3.2 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) 3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1700 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | – | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | – | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | – | 4 MB |
| Process | 4 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| TDP | – | 10 Watt |
| Transistor Count | – | – |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Adreno 650 |
| Architecture | – | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | 645 MHz |
| Execution units | – | 2 |
| Shading units | – | 512 |
| FLOPS | – | 1,267 GFLOPS |
| Memory bus | – | – |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Bus | – | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | – | 44 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Dual-core NPU and DSP | Hexagon 698 |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 8K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | – | X55 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | 7.35 Gbps (5G), 3 Gbps (4G) | 7.5 Gbps (5G), 2.5 Gbps (4G) |
| Peak Upload speed | 3.67 Gbps (5G), 422 Mbps (4G) | 3 Gbps (5G), 316 Mbps (4G) |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | January 2022 | January 2021 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | s5e9925 | SM8250-ACSM8250-AC |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 2200 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 official site |
Also Read: Exynos 1080 vs Snapdragon 870
Review by Tenzys Tech
CPU
However, while discussing the various CPUs, clock speed is not just the metric on which it is based, but it also includes the core generation employed in that specific SoC. Keeping this in mind, the clock speed of Samsung’s Exynos 2200 is 3 GHz of premium cortex x2, which is the successor to cortex X1 utilized in the Exynos 2100 and has a clock speed of 2.9 GHz. Another three medium cortex A710 cores run at 2.5 GHz, while four Cortex A510 power efficiency cores run at 1.8 GHz.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 870, on the other hand, is equipped with a single high-performance Cortex-A77 core clocked at 3.2 GHz. Another three medium Cortex-A77 cores run at 2.42 GHz, while four energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores run at 1.8 GHz. So, based on the enhanced and updated cores, Samsung’s Exynos 2200 outperforms Qualcomm’s Snapragon 870.
GPU
The Exynos 2200’s GPU is a Samsung Xclipse 920 with a clock speed of 1300 GHz. Snapdragon 870, on the other hand, is outfitted with the Adreno 650, which has a clock speed of just 675 MHz. So, based on their setup, it is concluded that Exynos 2200 is superior to Snapdragon 870.
Memory
The memory frequency of Exynos 2200 is 3200 MHz while in Sanpdragon 870 it is 2750 MHz which means memory speed is better in Exynos 2200.
Energy efficiency and battery life
According to the specifications, the Exynos 2200 is built on 4 nm lithography, while the Snapdragon 870 is based on 7 nm manufacturing technology. This means that Exynos 220 is more power efficient than Snapdragon 870.
Also Read: Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 888
Samsung Exynos 2200
Summary
Advanced and latest flagship Chipset by Samsung for the flagship phones of 2022.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
Summary
The overall good chipset in flagship series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Exynos 2200 is better than Snapdragon 870?
The performance of Snapdragon 870 lags behind the Exynos 2200 due to their Antutu Scores which are 970630 and 644114 respectively. However, the GPU of Exynos 2200 outperforms with 1300 MHz frequency as of 645 MHz of Snapdragon 870. So, there is no doubt that in the graphical intensive task Exynos 2200 is a better option. While overall comparison of both the SoCs indicates the better option towards Exynos 2200.
Which Exynos processor is equal to Snapdragon 888?
Overall, the Exynos 2100 is expected to be the second-fastest SoC for Android handsets, trailing only the Snapdragon 888 in terms of CPU performance. As a result, 2100 should be able to handle any demanding workloads with ease conclude to approximately similar to Snapdragon 888.
Also Read:
