Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 888: Reviews and Benchmarks

Share on:

Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 888: Reviews and Benchmarks | Exynos 2200 vs Sd 888

We have arranged a full comparison of Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 888 which are launched by Samsung and Qualcomm respectively. Now we have compared these two 8 core processors based on their pros and cons, Geekbench, Antutu, and technical specifications.

CPU Performance

Exynos 2200

Snapdragon 888

Gaming Performance

Exynos 2200

Snapdragon 888

Battery Life

Exynos 2200

Snapdragon 888

Tenzys Tech Score

Exynos 2200

Snapdragon 888

Major differences between Exynos 2200 Vs Snapdragon 888

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 is the latest SOC as announced 14-months later than Snapdragon 888.
  • Exynos 2200 has 20.62% higher Antutu 9 score than Snapdragon 888 (965k vs 800k).
  • Exynos 2200 has 54.76% higher GPU frequency than Snapdragon 888 (1300 vs 840 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has smaller-sized transistors, hence better than Snapdragon 888.
  • Instruction set is latest as compared to Snapdragon 888, hence better.

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888

  • Snapdragon processors are more optimized for the games by the developers.

Full comparison between Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 888

SoC:Exynos 2200Snapdragon 888

Antutu 9

Total Score:

Exynos 2200

Snapdragon 888


Also Read: Dimensity 920 vs Snapdragon 690

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

Exynos 2200

Snapdragon 888

Multi-Core Score

Exynos 2200

Snapdragon 888

Image compression176.7 Mpixels/s
Face detection27.4 images/s
Speech recognition68.35 words/s
Machine learning66.45 images/s
Camera shooting36.4 images/s
HTML 53.91 Mnodes/s
SQLite1060 Krows/s


Exynos 2200

Snapdragon 888

Graphics test93%
Stability32 FPS

Gaming Benchmarks

GamesFrames Per SecondFrames Per Second
PUBG Mobile83
Shadowgun Legends89
World of Tanks Blitz112
Genshin Impact58
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang60
Call of Duty: Mobile60

Also Read: Exynos 2100 vs Snapdragon 870


Max On-Device Display4K @ 120 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz 4K @ 60 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz
Max On-Display Resolution3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max External Display4K @ 60 Hz4K @ 60 Hz
HDRHDR10+, HDR10 HDR10+, HDR10,  HLG, Dolby Vision
Color DepthUp to 10-bitUp to 10-bit
Color GamutRec2020Rec2020


ArchitectureNA – Cortex-X2
3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Base Frequency1800 MHz1800 MHz
2840 MHz
Instruction setARMv9-AARMv8.4-A
L1 cache512 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache4 MB
Process4 nanometers5 nanometers
TDP10 Watt
Transistor Count


GPU nameSamsung Xclipse 920Adreno 660
ArchitectureAdreno 600
GPU frequency1300 MHz840 MHz
Execution units2
Shading units512
Memory bus64 bit
Vulkan version1.11.1
OpenCL version2.02.0
DirectX version1212


Memory typeLPDDR5LPDDR5
Memory frequency3200 MHz3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth51.2 Gbit/s
Max size24 GB24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU)Dual-core NPU and DSPHexagon 780
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution1x 200MP1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Video capture8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS8K at 30FPS
Video codecsH.264, H.265, AV1, VP9H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
Audio codecsAAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAVAAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV


4G supportLTE Cat. 24LTE Cat. 22
5G supportYesYes
Peak Download speed7.35 Gbps (5G), 3 Gbps (4G)7.5 Gbps (5G), 2.5 Gbps (4G)
Peak Upload speed3.67 Gbps (5G), 422 Mbps (4G) 3 Gbps (5G), 316 Mbps (4G)
NavigationGPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVICGPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC


AnnouncedJanuary 2022December 2020
Model number
Official pageSamsung Exynos 2200 official siteQualcomm Snapdragon 888 official site


ChargingQualcomm Quick Charge 5 technology
Qualcomm Quick Charge AI(0-100% in less than 15 minutes)

Also Read: Exynos 1080 vs Snapdragon 870

Review by Tenzys Tech


However, if we talk about the various CPUs then Clockspeed is not only the parameter on which it relies but also includes the core generation which is used in that particular SoC. So keeping this into mind, the clock speed of Samsung’s Exynos 2200 is officially not confirmed yet but it comes with updated cores in which one core (performance core) is cortex x2 which is the successor of cortex X1 used in Exynos 2100 with 2.9 GHz. Another 3 Medium cortex A710 cores are of 2.5 GHz and 4 Cortex A510 power efficiency cores of 1.8 GHz frequency.

While on another hand, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 888 consists of a 1 performance Cortex X1 core which is clocked at 2.84 GHz. Another 3 medium Cortex A78 Cores clocked at 2.42 GHz and 4 energy-efficient Cortex A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. So based on the updated cores, Samsung’s Exynos 2200 is better in performance as compared to Snapdragon 888.


In the context of GPU, the Exynos 2200 consists of Samsung Xclipse 920 with 1300 GHz clock speed. On other hand, Snapdragon 888 is equipped with Adreno 660 which has a clock speed of 840 MHz only. So based on their configuration it concludes that Exynos 2200 is better as compared to Snapdragon 888.

Energy efficiency and battery life

According to the specs, Samsung’s Exynos 2200 is constructed on 4 nm lithography, whereas Snapdragon 888 is built on 5nm process technology. This indicates that the Exynos 2200 is more power-efficient than the Snapdragon 888 because the small size semiconductor indicates a greater number of transistors embedded in the SoC (System on Chip), which not only saves energy but also significantly improves the overall performance of the chipset.

Samsung Exynos 2200

Tenzys Tech

Samsung Exynos 2200
Energy efficiency and battery life


Advanced and latest flagship Chipset by Samsung for the flagship phones of 2022.


Qualcomm Snapdragon 888

Tenzys Tech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
Energy efficiency and battery life


Best performer in the flagship series of Qualcomm in 2021.


Q n A

Is Exynos 2200 is better than Snapdragon 888?

The performance of the Samsung Exynos 2200 AMD GPU is up to 34% faster than the previous graphics card. Antutu gives it a score of 965874, which is around 20% higher than Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 888. Exynos 2200, on the other hand, has more updated CPU cores than Snapdragon 888 and offers significant advances in numerous technological features like as connectivity, CPU instruction set, and display, while Snapdragon 888 tops single and multi-core Geek Benchmark rankings.

Will Exynos 2200 beat Snapdragon?

Unfortunately, in single-core tests, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 outperforms the Exynos 2200. The findings were released on the same day, revealing that the Exynos 2200 easily defeated the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in multi-core tests but fell short in single-core tests.

Which chipset is better than Snapdragon 888?

Both the chips have almost the same CPU cores and are configured in the same way. The Samsung’s Exynos 2100, on the other side, takes first place in this area since all of its CPU cores are faster than the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 processor.

Also Read:

5/5 - (1 vote)
Share on:

Leave a Comment