Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 888: Reviews and Benchmarks | Exynos 2200 vs Sd 888
We have arranged a full comparison of Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 888 which are launched by Samsung and Qualcomm respectively. Now we have compared these two 8 core processors based on their pros and cons, Geekbench, Antutu, and technical specifications.
Tenzys Tech Score
- 1 Major differences between Exynos 2200 Vs Snapdragon 888
- 2 Full comparison between Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 888
- 3 Antutu 9
- 4 GeekBench 5
- 5 3DMark
- 6 Gaming Benchmarks
- 7 Display
- 8 CPU
- 9 Graphics
- 10 Memory
- 11 Multimedia (ISP)
- 12 Connectivity
- 13 Info
- 14 Additional
- 15 Review by Tenzys Tech
- 16 Q n A
- 17 What new Samsung Exynos 1280 chipset has to offer
- 18 New MacBooks may be released with M2 processor later this year
- 19 Dimensity 8100, 8000 and 1300 announced by MediaTek and debut with smartphones in March
Major differences between Exynos 2200 Vs Snapdragon 888
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
- Exynos 2200 is the latest SOC as announced 14-months later than Snapdragon 888.
- Exynos 2200 has 20.62% higher Antutu 9 score than Snapdragon 888 (965k vs 800k).
- Exynos 2200 has 54.76% higher GPU frequency than Snapdragon 888 (1300 vs 840 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has smaller-sized transistors, hence better than Snapdragon 888.
- Instruction set is latest as compared to Snapdragon 888, hence better.
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
- Snapdragon processors are more optimized for the games by the developers.
Full comparison between Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 888
|SoC:||Exynos 2200||Snapdragon 888|
Also Read: Dimensity 920 vs Snapdragon 690
|Image compression||–||176.7 Mpixels/s|
|Face detection||–||27.4 images/s|
|Speech recognition||–||68.35 words/s|
|Machine learning||–||66.45 images/s|
|Camera shooting||–||36.4 images/s|
|HTML 5||–||3.91 Mnodes/s|
|Games||Frames Per Second||Frames Per Second|
|World of Tanks Blitz||–||112|
|Mobile Legends: Bang Bang||–||60|
|Call of Duty: Mobile||–||60|
Also Read: Exynos 2100 vs Snapdragon 870
|Max On-Device Display||4K @ 120 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz||4K @ 60 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz|
|Max On-Display Resolution||3840 x 2160||3840 x 2160|
|Max External Display||4K @ 60 Hz||4K @ 60 Hz|
|HDR||HDR10+, HDR10||HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, Dolby Vision|
|Color Depth||Up to 10-bit||Up to 10-bit|
|Architecture||NA – Cortex-X2|
3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
|1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)|
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
|Base Frequency||1800 MHz||1800 MHz|
|L1 cache||–||512 KB|
|L2 cache||–||1 MB|
|L3 cache||–||4 MB|
|Process||4 nanometers||5 nanometers|
|GPU name||Samsung Xclipse 920||Adreno 660|
|GPU frequency||1300 MHz||840 MHz|
|Memory bus||–||64 bit|
|Memory frequency||3200 MHz||3200 MHz|
|Bus||–||4x 16 Bit|
|Max bandwidth||–||51.2 Gbit/s|
|Max size||24 GB||24 GB|
|Neural processor (NPU)||Dual-core NPU and DSP||Hexagon 780|
|Storage type||UFS 3.1||UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1|
|Max display resolution||3840 x 2160||3840 x 2160|
|Max camera resolution||1x 200MP||1x 200MP, 2x 25MP|
|Video capture||8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS||8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS|
|Video playback||8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS||8K at 30FPS|
|Video codecs||H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9||H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9|
|Audio codecs||AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV||AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV|
|4G support||LTE Cat. 24||LTE Cat. 22|
|Peak Download speed||7.35 Gbps (5G), 3 Gbps (4G)||7.5 Gbps (5G), 2.5 Gbps (4G)|
|Peak Upload speed||3.67 Gbps (5G), 422 Mbps (4G)||3 Gbps (5G), 316 Mbps (4G)|
|Navigation||GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC||GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC|
|Announced||January 2022||December 2020|
|Official page||Samsung Exynos 2200 official site||Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 official site|
|Charging||–||Qualcomm Quick Charge 5 technology|
Qualcomm Quick Charge AI(0-100% in less than 15 minutes)
Also Read: Exynos 1080 vs Snapdragon 870
Review by Tenzys Tech
However, if we talk about the various CPUs then Clockspeed is not only the parameter on which it relies but also includes the core generation which is used in that particular SoC. So keeping this into mind, the clock speed of Samsung’s Exynos 2200 is officially not confirmed yet but it comes with updated cores in which one core (performance core) is cortex x2 which is the successor of cortex X1 used in Exynos 2100 with 2.9 GHz. Another 3 Medium cortex A710 cores are of 2.5 GHz and 4 Cortex A510 power efficiency cores of 1.8 GHz frequency.
While on another hand, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 888 consists of a 1 performance Cortex X1 core which is clocked at 2.84 GHz. Another 3 medium Cortex A78 Cores clocked at 2.42 GHz and 4 energy-efficient Cortex A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. So based on the updated cores, Samsung’s Exynos 2200 is better in performance as compared to Snapdragon 888.
In the context of GPU, the Exynos 2200 consists of Samsung Xclipse 920 with 1300 GHz clock speed. On other hand, Snapdragon 888 is equipped with Adreno 660 which has a clock speed of 840 MHz only. So based on their configuration it concludes that Exynos 2200 is better as compared to Snapdragon 888.
Energy efficiency and battery life
According to the specs, Samsung’s Exynos 2200 is constructed on 4 nm lithography, whereas Snapdragon 888 is built on 5nm process technology. This indicates that the Exynos 2200 is more power-efficient than the Snapdragon 888 because the small size semiconductor indicates a greater number of transistors embedded in the SoC (System on Chip), which not only saves energy but also significantly improves the overall performance of the chipset.
Samsung Exynos 2200
Advanced and latest flagship Chipset by Samsung for the flagship phones of 2022.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
Best performer in the flagship series of Qualcomm in 2021.
Q n A
Is Exynos 2200 is better than Snapdragon 888?
The performance of the Samsung Exynos 2200 AMD GPU is up to 34% faster than the previous graphics card. Antutu gives it a score of 965874, which is around 20% higher than Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 888. Exynos 2200, on the other hand, has more updated CPU cores than Snapdragon 888 and offers significant advances in numerous technological features like as connectivity, CPU instruction set, and display, while Snapdragon 888 tops single and multi-core Geek Benchmark rankings.
Will Exynos 2200 beat Snapdragon?
Unfortunately, in single-core tests, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 outperforms the Exynos 2200. The findings were released on the same day, revealing that the Exynos 2200 easily defeated the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in multi-core tests but fell short in single-core tests.
Which chipset is better than Snapdragon 888?
Both the chips have almost the same CPU cores and are configured in the same way. The Samsung’s Exynos 2100, on the other side, takes first place in this area since all of its CPU cores are faster than the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 processor.