We have arranged a full comparison of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 780G Vs Snapdragon 768G in which both the SoC are 5G compatible. Now we have compared these two processors on the basis of pros and cons, Geekbench, Antutu, and technical specifications.
CPU Performance
Gaming Performance
Battery Life
Tenzys Tech Score
Contents
- 1 Major differences between Snapdragon 780G Vs Snapdragon 768G
- 2 Full comparison between Snapdragon 780G vs Snapdragon 768G
- 3 Gaming Performance
- 4 Antutu 8
- 5 GeekBench 5
- 6 Display
- 7 CPU
- 8 Graphics
- 9 Memory
- 10 Multimedia (ISP)
- 11 Connectivity
- 12 Info
- 13 Additional
- 14 Review by Tenzys Tech
- 15 Q n A
- 16 What new Samsung Exynos 1280 chipset has to offer
- 17 New MacBooks may be released with M2 processor later this year
- 18 Dimensity 8100, 8000 and 1300 announced by MediaTek and debut with smartphones in March
Major differences between Snapdragon 780G Vs Snapdragon 768G
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
- Snapdragon 780G shows a significantly better (up to 51.29%) AnTuTu 8 score than Snapdragon 768G (525K vs 347K).
- Snapdragon 780G has 40% smaller size of semiconductor than Snapdragon 768G (5 versus 7 nm).
- Snapdragon 780G is the latest SOC as announced 10-months later than the Snapdragon 768G.
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
- SD 768G has a 16.66% higher CPU clock speed than SD 780G (2800 vs 2400 MHz).
- Snapdragon 768G has 53.06% higher GPU frequency than Snapdragon 780G (750 vs 490 MHz).
- Snapdragon 768G has 12.12% higher peak download speed than Snapdragon 780G (3.7 vs 3.3 Gbps).
Full comparison between Snapdragon 780G vs Snapdragon 768G
| SoC: | Snapdragon 780G | Snapdragon 768G |
Gaming Performance
| Games | FPS(Frames Per Second) | FPS(Frames Per Second) |
|---|---|---|
| Fortnite Mobile | – | 26.3 |
| PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | – | 52.7 |
| Garena Free Fire – The Cobra | – | 56.7 |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | – | 39.1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | – | 44.9 |
| Minecraft: Pocket Edition | – | 72.2 |
| Real Racing 3 | – | 85.1 |
| Sniper 3D | – | 124.7 |
| Need for Speed No Limits | – | 102.1 |
| Mortal Kombat X | – | 82.2 |
| CSR Racing 2 | – | 68 |
Antutu 8
Total Score:
| CPU | 161413 | 108959 |
| GPU | 164393 | 101754 |
| Memory | 85627 | 63639 |
| UX | 114231 | 73240 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Display
| Max On-Device Display | Up to FHD @ 144 Hz | QHD+ @ 60 Hz , FHD+ @ 120 Hz |
| Max External Display | 4K @ 60 Hz | 4K @ 60Hz |
| HDR | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | HDR10+, HDR10 |
| Color Depth | Up to 10-bit | Up to 10-bit |
| Color Gamut | Rec2020 | Rec2020 |
CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78) 3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78) 4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55) | 1x 2.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76) 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76) 6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1900 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Instruction set | – | ARMv8.3-A |
| L1 cache | – | – |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | – |
| L3 cache | – | – |
| Process | 5 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Transistor Count | – | – |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 642 | Adreno 620 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 490 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 3 |
| Shading units | 384 | 192 |
| FLOPS | – | 700 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | 17 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 770 | Hexagon 696 |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 |
| Max display resolution | 3360 x 1600 | 3200 x 1800 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X53 | X52 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | 5G Band- Up to 3.3 Gbps, LTE – Up to 1.2 Gbps | 5G Band- Up to 3.7 Gbps, LTE – Up to 1.2 Gbps |
| Upload speed | 5G Band: Up to 3.3 Gbps, LTE- Up to 210 Mbps | 5G Band- Up to 1.6 Gbps, LTE- Up to 210 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS |
Info
| Announced | March 2021 | May 2020 |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Model number | SM7350-AB | SM7250-AC |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G official site |
Additional
| Charging | Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ technology | Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ technology Qualcomm Quick Charge AI |
Review by Tenzys Tech
CPU
The CPU of Snapdragon 780G is clocked up to 2.4 GHz while Snapdragon 768G is clocked up to 2.8 GHz, but still, SD 780G is a better option than Snapdragon 768G because the snapdragon 780G has the latest cortex A78 cores while Snapdragon 768G has cortex A76 cores. Due to this Snapdragon 780G has a better performance gain.
GPU
GPU of chipset snapdragon 780G is equipped with Adreno 642 while the snapdragon 768G is equipped with Adreno 620. Frankly, Adreno 642 is much better than Adreno 620 other than the clock speed of Adreno 620, so choose wisely.
Display
In-display section, Snapdragon 780G supports display up to 144Hz refresh rate in FHD resolution while display resolution in Snapdragon 768G supports only up to 120 Hz in FHD+ resolution only but it also has an option of QHD+ resolution with 60 Hz refresh rate. So consequences and advantages are present in bot the SoCs.
Energy efficiency and battery life
As the facts are seen by the specifications in which Snapdragon 780G built on 5 nm lithography while Snapdragon 768G built on 7nm process technology. This points out that Snapdragon 780G is better than Snapdragon 768G in Power efficiency as the small size semiconductor indicates the more no. of transistors embedded in SoC (System on Chip) which is not only energy efficient but also significantly enhances the overall performance of the chipset.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
Summary
The best chipset in mid-tier range (700 series) of Qualcomm.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
Summary
Overall Good chipset with a overclock version of SD 765G.
Q n A
Q1. Which is better Snapdragon 780G or Snapdragon 768G?
Ans. Snapdragon 780G is better than Snapdragon 768G as the CPU of SD 780G equipped with the latest Cortex A78 cores while Snapdragon 768G comes with Cortex A76 cores. In several segments like connectivity, camera, display, and energy efficiency(5nm vs 7nm) capabilities Snapdragon 780G perform better as compared to Snapdragon 768G.
Also Read:
