We have arranged a full comparison of Snapdragon 780G vs Snapdragon 778G where both the SoCs are launched by Qualcomm. Now we have compared these two 8 core processors based on their pros and cons, Geekbench, Antutu, and technical specifications.
CPU Performance
Gaming Performance
Battery Life
Tenzys Tech Score
Contents
- 1 Major differences between Snapdragon 780G Vs Snapdragon 778G
- 2 Full comparison between Snapdragon 780G vs Snapdragon 778G
- 3 Antutu 8
- 4 GeekBench 5
- 5 Display
- 6 CPU
- 7 Graphics
- 8 Memory
- 9 Multimedia (ISP)
- 10 Connectivity
- 11 Info
- 12 Additional
- 13 Review by Tenzys Tech
- 14 Q n A
- 15 What new Samsung Exynos 1280 chipset has to offer
- 16 New MacBooks may be released with M2 processor later this year
- 17 Dimensity 8100, 8000 and 1300 announced by MediaTek and debut with smartphones in March
Major differences between Snapdragon 780G Vs Snapdragon 778G
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
- Snapdragon 780G has 16.66% smaller transistors than Snapdragon 778G (5nm versus 6nm).
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
- Snapdragon 778G is the latest SOC as announced 2-months later than Snapdragon 780G.
- Peak Download Speed of Snapdragon 778G is 12.12% higher than Snapdragon 780G. (3.7 vs 3.3 Gbps).
- Memory Capacity of Snapdragon 778G is 33.33% higher than Snapdragon 780G (16 vs 12 GB).
Full comparison between Snapdragon 780G vs Snapdragon 778G
| SoC: | Snapdragon 780G | Snapdragon 778G |
Antutu 8
Total Score:
| CPU | 161413 | 161744 |
| GPU | 164393 | 156423 |
| Memory | 85627 | 90737 |
| UX | 114231 | 131554 |
Also Checkout: Dimensity 1200 vs Snapdragon 780G
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Display
| Max On-Device Display | Up to FHD @ 144 Hz | Full HD+ @ 144 Hz |
| Max External Display | 4K @ 60 Hz | 4K @ 60 Hz |
| HDR | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, Dolby Vision | HDR10+, HDR10 |
| Color Depth | Up to 10-bit | Up to 10-bit |
| Color Gamut | Rec2020 | Rec2020 |
CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78) 3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78) 4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55) | 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78) 3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78) 4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1900 MHz | 1900 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | – |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | – |
| Process | 5 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| TDP | 5 Watt | – |
| Transistor Count | – | – |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 642 | Adreno 642L |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 490 MHz | – |
| Execution units | 2 | – |
| Shading units | 384 | – |
| FLOPS | – | – |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | – |
| Max bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | – |
| Max size | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 770 | Hexagon 770 |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3360 x 1600 | 3360 x 1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Also Read: Snapdragon 870 vs Snapdragon 768G
Connectivity
| Modem | X53 | X53 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download speed | 3.3 Gbps | 3.7 Gbps |
| Peak Upload speed | Up to 3.3 Gbps | – |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | March 2021 | May 2021 |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Model number | SM7350-AB | SM7325 |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site |
Additional
| Charging | Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ technology | Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ technology Qualcomm Quick Charge AI |
Review by Tenzys Tech
CPU
The CPU specifications of both the chipsets are the same so both chipsets have equal capabilities in terms of CPU power.
GPU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G is equipped with Adreno 642 GPU while the snapdragon 778G is equipped with Adreno 642L. Frankly, Adreno 642 is a slightly better GPU than Adreno 642L. Also Read: Snapdragon 888 vs Snapdragon 778G
Memory
The maximum memory supported by Snapdragon 780G is 12 GB with the frequency of 2133 MHz while Snapdragon 778G supports up to 16 GB with the frequency of 3200 MHz, making Snapdragon 778G a superior one in this segment.
Display and Camera
In display Section, both the SOCs comprised of resolution of 3360 x 1600 with 144 Hz refresh rate compatibility.
Energy efficiency and battery life
There are some facts that are extracted out from the specifications in which Snapdragon 780G built on 5nm process technology while Snapdragon 778G built on 6nm technology. However, the TDP of SD 778G is not known till now. But we can conclude that Snapdragon 780G has more transistors as compared to Snapdragon 778G. So, Snapdragon 780G has better energy efficiency.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
Summary
Overall a good chipset in a flagship series.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
Summary
Good performer in upper mid-range Series of smartphones.
Q n A
Which is better Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G or Snapdragon 778G?
Both the processors are quite similar except some minimal differences in memory, GPU, process lithography (5nm vs 6nm), connectivity and camera segment. Apart from this all the specifications of Snapdragon 780G and Snapdragon 778G are same.
Also Read:
The 780g was manufactured at Samsung 5nm node and the 778g at TSMC 6nm node. TSMC is known to deliver the most efficiently performing chips in the industry. Also it was rumored that the yields of Samsung’s most advanced nodes struggled to meet it’s target. The 780g production seems to have ended prematurely, and even during production they were hard to come by according to a Xiaomi executive