We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
A14 Bionic vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by
Apple and Samsung
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
6-core
and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A14 Bionic47
Exynos 240083
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A14 Bionic43
Exynos 240074
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A14 Bionic82
Exynos 240086
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A14 Bionic57
Exynos 240081
SoC
A14 Bionic
VS
Exynos 2400
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
A14 Bionic
Exynos 2400
CPU
203493
510545
GPU
284242
587630
Memory
131989
322132
UX
131211
260123
Total score
750935
1680430
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400
Exynos 2400 has
3.55%
higher CPU clock speed than
A14 Bionic (3210 vs
3100 MHz).
Exynos 2400 has
96.91%
higher memory frequency than
A14 Bionic (4200 vs
2133 MHz).
Exynos 2400 has
20%
smaller sized transistor than
A14 Bionic (4 vs
5 nm).
Exynos 2400 has
123.78%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
A14 Bionic (1,680 K vs
751 K ).
Exynos 2400 has latest
instruction set,
hence better than
A14 Bionic.