We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
A15 Bionic Chip vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by
Apple and Samsung
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
6-core
and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A15 Bionic Chip55
Exynos 240088
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A15 Bionic Chip55
Exynos 240076
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A15 Bionic Chip82
Exynos 240086
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A15 Bionic Chip64
Exynos 240083
SoC
A15 Bionic Chip
VS
Exynos 2400
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
A15 Bionic Chip
Exynos 2400
CPU
209204
510545
GPU
351594
587630
Memory
118044
322132
UX
130276
260123
Total score
809118
1680430
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A15 Bionic Chip
A15 Bionic Chip has
0.62%
higher CPU clock speed than
Exynos 2400 (3230 vs
3210 MHz).
A15 Bionic Chip has
18.93%
higher GPU clock speed than
Exynos 2400 (1200 vs
1009 MHz).
A15 Bionic Chip has
1.57%
higher memory frequency than
Exynos 2400 (4266 vs
4200 MHz).
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400
Exynos 2400 has
20%
smaller sized transistor than
A15 Bionic Chip (4 vs
5 nm).
Exynos 2400 has
107.69%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
A15 Bionic Chip (1,680 K vs
809 K ).
Exynos 2400 has latest
instruction set,
hence better than
A15 Bionic Chip.