We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
A16 Bionic chip vs Kirin 9010 SoCs by
Apple and
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
6-core
and 12-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A16 Bionic chip61
Kirin 901055
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A16 Bionic chip62
Kirin 901038
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A16 Bionic chip86
Kirin 901075
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A16 Bionic chip70
Kirin 901056
SoC
A16 Bionic chip
VS
Kirin 9010
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
A16 Bionic chip
Kirin 9010
CPU
247110
305156
GPU
408357
197179
Memory
162944
266091
UX
146541
201408
Total score
964952
969834
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
A16 Bionic chip has
50.43%
higher CPU clock speed than
Kirin 9010 (3460 vs
2300 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
86.40%
higher GPU clock speed than
Kirin 9010 (1398 vs
750 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
132.73%
higher memory frequency than
Kirin 9010 (6400 vs
2750 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
42.86%
smaller sized transistor than
Kirin 9010 (4 vs
7 nm).
A16 Bionic chip has latest instruction set, hence
better than
Kirin 9010.
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9010
Kirin 9010 has
0.51%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
A16 Bionic chip (970 K vs
965 K ).