We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
A16 Bionic chip vs Snapdragon 778g SoCs by
Apple and Qualcomm
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
6-core
and 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A16 Bionic chip61
Snapdragon 778g32
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A16 Bionic chip62
Snapdragon 778g25
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A16 Bionic chip86
Snapdragon 778g79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A16 Bionic chip70
Snapdragon 778g45
SoC
A16 Bionic chip
VS
Snapdragon 778g
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
A16 Bionic chip
Snapdragon 778g
CPU
247110
161744
GPU
408357
156423
Memory
162944
90737
UX
146541
131554
Total score
964952
540458
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
A16 Bionic chip has
44.17%
higher CPU clock speed than
Snapdragon 778g (3460 vs
2400 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
185.31%
higher GPU clock speed than
Snapdragon 778g (1398 vs
490 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
100.00%
higher memory frequency than
Snapdragon 778g (6400 vs
3200 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
33.33%
smaller sized transistor than
Snapdragon 778g (4 vs
6 nm).
A16 Bionic chip has
78.54%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Snapdragon 778g (965 K
vs
540 K).
A16 Bionic chip has latest instruction set, hence
better than
Snapdragon 778g.