We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
A16 Bionic chip vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by
Apple and Samsung
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
6-core
and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A16 Bionic chip61
Exynos 240088
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A16 Bionic chip62
Exynos 240076
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A16 Bionic chip86
Exynos 240086
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A16 Bionic chip70
Exynos 240083
SoC
A16 Bionic chip
VS
Exynos 2400
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
A16 Bionic chip
Exynos 2400
CPU
247110
510545
GPU
408357
587630
Memory
162944
322132
UX
146541
260123
Total score
964952
1680430
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
A16 Bionic chip has
7.79%
higher CPU clock speed than
Exynos 2400 (3460 vs
3210 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
38.55%
higher GPU clock speed than
Exynos 2400 (1398 vs
1009 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
52.38%
higher memory frequency than
Exynos 2400 (6400 vs
4200 MHz).
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400
Exynos 2400 has
74.15%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
A16 Bionic chip (1,680 K vs
965 K ).
Exynos 2400 has latest
instruction set,
hence better than
A16 Bionic chip.