Overview - Kirin 9000 Vs Dimensity 6100 Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 6100 Plus SoCs by Hisilicon and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 9000 39
Dimensity 6100 Plus 20
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 9000 35
Dimensity 6100 Plus 15
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 9000 86
Dimensity 6100 Plus 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 9000 53
Dimensity 6100 Plus 38
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Kirin 9000 Dimensity 6100 Plus
CPU 194527 112256
GPU 280796 98184
Memory 146761 66187
UX 140303 84704
Total score 762387 361331
Key Differences

Pros of Hisilicon Kirin 9000

  • Kirin 9000 has 42.27% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 6100 Plus (3130 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has 28.93% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 6100 Plus (2750 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 6100 Plus (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Kirin 9000 has 110.99% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 6100 Plus (762 K vs 361 K).

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus

  • Dimensity 6100 Plus has 25.00% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 9000 (950 vs 760 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 1054
Dimensity 6100 Plus 580

Multi-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 3724
Dimensity 6100 Plus 1707

3DMark

Stability 54%

Graphics test 36 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - Full HD+ @ 120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

77%
Turbo Clock Speed

3130 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

51%
Base Frequency

2050 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77
    3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77
    4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55
    2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 64 KB 512 KB
  • L2 cache 0.512 MB 1 MB
  • L3 cache 4 MB 2 MB
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count 15.3 Billion -
  • TDP 4 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP24 Mali-G57 MC2
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 760 MHz 950 MHz
  • Execution units 24 2
  • Shading units 384 32
  • FLOPS 1076 Gigaflops 243 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) AI accelerator Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Balong 5000 3GPP Release-16 standard 5G modem
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 7168 Mbps 3300 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed 2560 Mbps -
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Hisilicon Kirin 9000

CPU
39%
GPU
35%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus

CPU
20%
GPU
15%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote