Menu

78

Points
Hisilicon Kirin 9000

Kirin 9000

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 8300

Dimensity 8300
Overview - Kirin 9000 Vs Dimensity 8300

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 8300 SoCs by Hisilicon and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 9000 41
Dimensity 8300 57
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 9000 36
Dimensity 8300 58
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 9000 86
Dimensity 8300 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 9000 54
Dimensity 8300 67
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Kirin 9000 Dimensity 8300
CPU 194527 282796
GPU 280796 542690
Memory 146761 328720
UX 140303 249840
Total score 762387 1404046
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300

  • Dimensity 8300 has 7.03% higher CPU clock speed than Kirin 9000 (3350 vs 3130 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8300 has 84.21% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 9000 (1400 vs 760 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8300 has 55.13% higher memory frequency than Kirin 9000 (4266 vs 2750 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8300 has 84.16% better AnTuTu 9 score than Kirin 9000 (1,404 K vs 762 K ).
  • Dimensity 8300 has latest instruction set, hence better than Kirin 9000.
  • Dimensity 8300 Support 55.00% higher memory bandwidth than Kirin 9000 (68.2 vs 44 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 1054
Dimensity 8300 1512

Multi-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 3724
Dimensity 8300 4886

3DMark

31%
Kirin 9000
Stability 54%

Graphics test 36 FPS
N/A
Dimensity 8300
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - WQHD+ @ 120Hz, FHD+ @ 180Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

83%
Turbo Clock Speed

3130 MHz

89%
Turbo Clock Speed

3350 MHz

93%
Base Frequency

2050 MHz

100%
Base Frequency

2200 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77
    3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77
    4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55
     1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
    3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache 64 KB -
  • L2 cache 0.512 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 15.3 Billion -
  • TDP 4 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP24 Mali-G615 MP6
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 4rd gen
  • GPU frequency 760 MHz 1400 MHz
  • Execution units 24 6
  • Shading units 384 -
  • FLOPS 1076 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2750 MHz 4266 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s 68.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) AI accelerator MediaTek APU 780
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Balong 5000 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Hisilicon Kirin 9000

Hisilicon Kirin 9000
CPU
41%
GPU
36%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 8300

MediaTek Dimensity 8300
CPU
57%
GPU
58%
Memory
50%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote