78

Points
Hisilicon Kirin 9000

78

Points
Mediatek Helio G88
Overview - Kirin 9000 Vs Helio G88

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 9000 vs Helio G88 SoCs by Hisilicon and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 9000 41
Helio G88 14
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 9000 36
Helio G88 10
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 9000 86
Helio G88 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 9000 54
Helio G88 27
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Kirin 9000 Helio G88
CPU 194527 69667
GPU 280796 47988
Memory 146761 44409
UX 140303 44272
Total score 762387 206336
Key Differences

Pros of Hisilicon Kirin 9000

  • Kirin 9000 has 56.50% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G88 (3130 vs 2000 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has 52.78% higher memory frequency than Helio G88 (2750 vs 1800 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G88 (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Kirin 9000 has 269.49% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G88 (762 K vs 206 K).

Pros of Mediatek Helio G88

  • Helio G88 has 31.58% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 9000 (1000 vs 760 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 1054
Helio G88 377

Multi-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 3724
Helio G88 1290

Image compression

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G88 82.7

Face detection

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G88 9.99

Speech recognition

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G88 25.2

Machine learning

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G88 19.5

Camera shooting

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G88 9.38

HTML 5

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G88 1.41

SQLite

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G88 415.2

3DMark

Stability 54%

Graphics test 36 FPS
Stability 98%

Graphics test 4 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - Full HD+ @90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

83%
Turbo Clock Speed

3130 MHz

53%
Turbo Clock Speed

2000 MHz

93%
Base Frequency

2050 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77
    3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77
    4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55
    2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 64 KB -
  • L2 cache 0.512 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count 15.3 Billion -
  • TDP 4 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP24 Mali-G52 MC2
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 760 MHz 1000 MHz
  • Execution units 24 2
  • Shading units 384 32
  • FLOPS 1076 Gigaflops 62 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2750 MHz 1800 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s 13.41 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) AI accelerator Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Balong 5000 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 7
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Hisilicon Kirin 9000

CPU
41%
GPU
36%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Helio G88

CPU
14%
GPU
10%
Memory
21%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote