Menu

78

Points
Hisilicon Kirin 9000

Kirin 9000

78

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1

Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
Overview - Kirin 9000 Vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 1

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 9000 vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoCs by Hisilicon and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 9000 41
Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 34
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 9000 36
Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 26
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 9000 86
Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 9000 54
Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 49
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Kirin 9000 Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
CPU 194527 177123
GPU 280796 162367
Memory 146761 101455
UX 140303 120496
Total score 762387 561441
Key Differences

Pros of Hisilicon Kirin 9000

  • Kirin 9000 has 30.42% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (3130 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has 26.67% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (760 vs 600 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has 35.79% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (762 K vs 561 K).

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1

  • Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 has 16.36% higher memory frequency than Kirin 9000 (3200 vs 2750 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 has latest instruction set, hence better than Kirin 9000.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 1054
Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 812

Multi-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 3724
Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 3081

3DMark

31%
Kirin 9000
Stability 54%

Graphics test 36 FPS
16%
Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
Stability 99%

Graphics test 17 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - FHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 3360 x 1600
  • Max External Display - QHD @ 60 Hz
  • HDR - HDR10+, HDR10
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

83%
Turbo Clock Speed

3130 MHz

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

93%
Base Frequency

2050 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77
    3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77
    4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55
     1x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A710
    3x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache 64 KB -
  • L2 cache 0.512 MB 3 MB
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 15.3 Billion -
  • TDP 4 W 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP24 Adreno 662
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency 760 MHz 600 MHz
  • Execution units 24 -
  • Shading units 384 384
  • FLOPS 1076 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2750 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s 25.6 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) AI accelerator Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3360 x 1600
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Balong 5000 X62
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Hisilicon Kirin 9000

Hisilicon Kirin 9000
CPU
41%
GPU
36%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
CPU
34%
GPU
26%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote