Overview - Kirin 9000 Vs Snapdragon 768g

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 9000 vs Snapdragon 768g SoCs by Hisilicon and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 9000 41
Snapdragon 768g 25
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 9000 36
Snapdragon 768g 19
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 9000 86
Snapdragon 768g 75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 9000 54
Snapdragon 768g 40
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Kirin 9000 Snapdragon 768g
CPU 194527 126539
GPU 280796 116499
Memory 146761 84021
UX 140303 120080
Total score 762387 447139
Key Differences

Pros of Hisilicon Kirin 9000

  • Kirin 9000 has 11.79% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 768g (3130 vs 2800 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has 1.33% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 768g (760 vs 750 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has 28.93% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 768g (2750 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has 42.86% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 768g (4 vs 7 nm).
  • Kirin 9000 has 70.50% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 768g (762 K vs 447 K).

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 768g

  • Snapdragon 768g has latest instruction set, hence better than Kirin 9000.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 1054
Snapdragon 768g 725

Multi-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 3724
Snapdragon 768g 2054

3DMark

Stability 54%

Graphics test 36 FPS
Stability 99%

Graphics test 11 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - FHD+ @ 120 Hz, QHD+ @ 60 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 3200 x 1800
  • Max External Display - 4K Ultra HD @ 60 Hz
  • HDR - HDR10+, HDR10
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

83%
Turbo Clock Speed

3130 MHz

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

93%
Base Frequency

2050 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77
    3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77
    4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55
    1x 2.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)
    1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)
    6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.3-A
  • L1 cache 64 KB -
  • L2 cache 0.512 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 7 nm
  • Transistor count 15.3 Billion -
  • TDP 4 W 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP24 Adreno 620
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency 760 MHz 750 MHz
  • Execution units 24 3
  • Shading units 384 192
  • FLOPS 1076 Gigaflops 700 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s 17 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) AI accelerator Hexagon 696
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.0
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3200 x 1800
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Balong 5000 X52
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Hisilicon Kirin 9000

CPU
41%
GPU
36%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 768g

CPU
25%
GPU
19%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote