We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
Kirin 9000 vs Snapdragon 768g SoCs by
Hisilicon and Qualcomm
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 900041
Snapdragon 768g25
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 900036
Snapdragon 768g19
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 900086
Snapdragon 768g75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 900054
Snapdragon 768g40
SoC
Kirin 9000
VS
Snapdragon 768g
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
Kirin 9000
Snapdragon 768g
CPU
194527
126539
GPU
280796
116499
Memory
146761
84021
UX
140303
120080
Total score
762387
447139
Key Differences
Pros of Hisilicon Kirin 9000
Kirin 9000 has
11.79%
higher CPU clock speed than
Snapdragon 768g (3130 vs
2800 MHz).
Kirin 9000 has
1.33%
higher GPU clock speed than
Snapdragon 768g (760 vs
750 MHz).
Kirin 9000 has
28.93%
higher memory frequency than
Snapdragon 768g (2750 vs
2133 MHz).
Kirin 9000 has
42.86%
smaller sized transistor than
Snapdragon 768g (4 vs
7 nm).
Kirin 9000 has
70.50%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Snapdragon 768g (762 K
vs
447 K).
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 768g
Snapdragon 768g has latest
instruction set,
hence better than
Kirin 9000.