78

Points
Hisilicon Kirin 9000

78

Points
Unisoc Tiger T700
Overview - Kirin 9000 Vs Tiger T700

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 9000 vs Tiger T700 SoCs by Hisilicon and Unisoc respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 9000 41
Tiger T700 14
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 9000 36
Tiger T700 9
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 9000 86
Tiger T700 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 9000 54
Tiger T700 27
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Kirin 9000 Tiger T700
CPU 194527 67140
GPU 280796 43026
Memory 146761 44785
UX 140303 58416
Total score 762387 213367
Key Differences

Pros of Hisilicon Kirin 9000

  • Kirin 9000 has 71.98% higher CPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (3130 vs 1820 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has 47.37% higher memory frequency than Tiger T700 (2750 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Tiger T700 (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Kirin 9000 has 257.31% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tiger T700 (762 K vs 213 K).

Pros of Unisoc Tiger T700

  • Tiger T700 has 11.84% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 9000 (850 vs 760 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 1054
Tiger T700 355

Multi-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 3724
Tiger T700 1349

Image compression

icon
Kirin 9000
Tiger T700 83.2

Face detection

icon
Kirin 9000
Tiger T700 9.85

Speech recognition

icon
Kirin 9000
Tiger T700 23.9

Machine learning

icon
Kirin 9000
Tiger T700 18.5

Camera shooting

icon
Kirin 9000
Tiger T700 9.6

HTML 5

icon
Kirin 9000
Tiger T700 1.37

SQLite

icon
Kirin 9000
Tiger T700 421.8

3DMark

Stability 54%

Graphics test 36 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - Full HD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2160 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

83%
Turbo Clock Speed

3130 MHz

48%
Turbo Clock Speed

1820 MHz

93%
Base Frequency

2050 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77
    3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77
    4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55
    2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 64 KB -
  • L2 cache 0.512 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count 15.3 Billion -
  • TDP 4 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP24 Mali-G52 MC2
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Bifrost 2
  • GPU frequency 760 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 24 2
  • Shading units 384 32
  • FLOPS 1076 Gigaflops 54.4 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.0
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 11
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2750 MHz 1866 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 6 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) AI accelerator Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2160 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 1K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 1080p at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Balong 5000 LTE Cat. 7
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 No
  • 5G support Yes -
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Hisilicon Kirin 9000

CPU
41%
GPU
36%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Unisoc Tiger T700

CPU
14%
GPU
9%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote