Menu

42

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 1050

Dimensity 1050

49

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 8050

Dimensity 8050
Overview - Dimensity 1050 Vs Dimensity 8050

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 1050 vs Dimensity 8050 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 1050 25
Dimensity 8050 37
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 1050 21
Dimensity 8050 30
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 1050 79
Dimensity 8050 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 1050 42
Dimensity 8050 49
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 1050 Dimensity 8050
CPU 137500 217200
GPU 159729 208098
Memory 96303 138670
UX 129591 138035
Total score 523123 702003
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 1050

  • Dimensity 1050 has 17.65% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 8050 (1000 vs 850 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1050 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 8050 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8050

  • Dimensity 8050 has 20% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 1050 (3000 vs 2500 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8050 has 34.19% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 1050 (702 K vs 523 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1050 745
Dimensity 8050 964

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1050 2142
Dimensity 8050 3261

3DMark

13%
Dimensity 1050
Stability 97%

Graphics test 15 FPS
23%
Dimensity 8050
Stability 96%

Graphics test 27 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @144 Hz QHD+ @ 90 Hz, FHD+ @ 168 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive, CUVA HDR-vivid, HLG and Dolby Vision -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

62%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

3000 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC3 Mali-G77 MC9
  • Architecture Valhall 3 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 1000 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 3 9
  • Shading units - 144
  • FLOPS - 980 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 34.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 550 MediaTek APU 570
  • Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 19
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 4600 Mbps 4700 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed 2770 Mbps -
  • 5G Upload Speed - 2500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed 1250 Mbps -
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 1050

Mediatek Dimensity 1050
CPU
25%
GPU
21%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Dimensity 8050

MediaTek Dimensity 8050
CPU
37%
GPU
30%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote