Menu

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 7200

Dimensity 7200

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 1050

Dimensity 1050
Overview - Dimensity 7200 Vs Dimensity 1050

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 7200 vs Dimensity 1050 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 7200 31
Dimensity 1050 27
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 7200 27
Dimensity 1050 22
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 7200 86
Dimensity 1050 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 7200 48
Dimensity 1050 43
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 7200 Dimensity 1050
CPU 160410 137500
GPU 202112 159729
Memory 119625 96303
UX 144980 129591
Total score 627127 523123
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 7200

  • Dimensity 7200 has 12.00% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 1050 (2800 vs 2500 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 1050 (6400 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 1050 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 19.88% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 1050 (627 K vs 523 K).
  • Dimensity 7200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 1050.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7200 889
Dimensity 1050 745

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7200 2376
Dimensity 1050 2142

3DMark

21%
Dimensity 7200
Stability %

Graphics test 24 FPS
13%
Dimensity 1050
Stability 97%

Graphics test 15 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display QHD+@90 Hz, FHD+@144 Hz FHD+ @144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2560 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR10+ Adaptive, CUVA HDR-vivid, HLG and Dolby Vision
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
     2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC4 Mali-G610 MC3
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 3
  • GPU frequency - 1000 MHz
  • Execution units 4 3
  • Shading units 512 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 40.7 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Mediatek APU 650 MediaTek APU 550
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2560 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem 2CC 5G Modem -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 7200

Mediatek Dimensity 7200
CPU
31%
GPU
27%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Dimensity 1050

Mediatek Dimensity 1050
CPU
27%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote