78

Points
Mediatek Helio G88
Overview - Dimensity 7200 Vs Helio G88

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 7200 vs Helio G88 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 7200 31
Helio G88 14
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 7200 27
Helio G88 10
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 7200 86
Helio G88 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 7200 48
Helio G88 27
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 7200 Helio G88
CPU 160410 69667
GPU 202112 47988
Memory 119625 44409
UX 144980 44272
Total score 627127 206336
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 7200

  • Dimensity 7200 has 40.00% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G88 (2800 vs 2000 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 255.56% higher memory frequency than Helio G88 (6400 vs 1800 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G88 (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 203.93% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G88 (627 K vs 206 K).
  • Dimensity 7200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G88.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7200 889
Helio G88 377

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7200 2376
Helio G88 1290

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G88 82.7

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G88 9.99

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G88 25.2

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G88 19.5

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G88 9.38

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G88 1.41

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G88 415.2

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test 24 FPS
Stability 98%

Graphics test 4 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display QHD+@90 Hz, FHD+@144 Hz Full HD+ @90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2560 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

53%
Turbo Clock Speed

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
    2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC4 Mali-G52 MC2
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency - 1000 MHz
  • Execution units 4 2
  • Shading units 512 32
  • FLOPS - 62 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 1800 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 40.7 Gbit/s 13.41 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Mediatek APU 650 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1
  • Max display resolution 2560 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem 2CC 5G Modem -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 7
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 7200

CPU
31%
GPU
27%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Helio G88

CPU
14%
GPU
10%
Memory
21%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote