Menu

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 810

Dimensity 810

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 7200

Dimensity 7200
Overview - Dimensity 810 Vs Dimensity 7200

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 810 vs Dimensity 7200 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 810 23
Dimensity 7200 31
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 810 16
Dimensity 7200 27
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 810 79
Dimensity 7200 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 810 39
Dimensity 7200 48
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 810 Dimensity 7200
CPU 113696 160410
GPU 85477 202112
Memory 76385 119625
UX 105966 144980
Total score 381524 627127
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 7200

  • Dimensity 7200 has 16.67% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 810 (2800 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 810 (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 810 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 64.37% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 810 (627 K vs 382 K ).
  • Dimensity 7200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 810.
  • Dimensity 7200 Support 138.43% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 810 (40.7 vs 17.07 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 621
Dimensity 7200 889

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 1897
Dimensity 7200 2376

3DMark

6%
Dimensity 810
Stability 99%

Graphics test 7 FPS
21%
Dimensity 7200
Stability %

Graphics test 24 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120Hz QHD+@90 Hz, FHD+@144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2560 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10 HDR10+
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB 512 KB
  • L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
  • L3 cache 2 MB 4 MB
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion 12 Billion
  • TDP 8 W 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G610 MC4
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall 2
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz -
  • Execution units 2 4
  • Shading units 32 512
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 6400 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s 40.7 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Mediatek APU 650
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2560 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - 2CC 5G Modem
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 21
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 810

Mediatek Dimensity 810
CPU
23%
GPU
16%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Mediatek Dimensity 7200

Mediatek Dimensity 7200
CPU
31%
GPU
27%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote