Overview - Dimensity 8100 Vs Dimensity 9000

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8100 vs Dimensity 9000 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8100 42
Dimensity 9000 49
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8100 38
Dimensity 9000 46
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8100 82
Dimensity 9000 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8100 54
Dimensity 9000 60
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8100 Dimensity 9000
CPU 204875 254411
GPU 311503 384881
Memory 130636 180981
UX 161518 185288
Total score 808532 1005561
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8100

  • Dimensity 8100 has 7.29% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 9000 (912 vs 850 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 70.67% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 9000 (6400 vs 3750 MHz).

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9000

  • Dimensity 9000 has 7.02% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 8100 (3050 vs 2850 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9000 has 20% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 8100 (4 vs 5 nm).
  • Dimensity 9000 has 24.37% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 8100 (1,006 K vs 809 K ).
  • Dimensity 9000 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 8100.
  • Dimensity 9000 Support 17.19% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 8100 (60 vs 51.2 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8100 969
Dimensity 9000 1275

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8100 4081
Dimensity 9000 4132

3DMark

Stability 94%

Graphics test 34 FPS
Stability 90%

Graphics test 47 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display WQHD+ @120Hz / Full HD+ @168Hz WQHD+ @144Hz / Full HD+ @180Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 3200 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

75%
Turbo Clock Speed

2850 MHz

81%
Turbo Clock Speed

3050 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
  • Process 5 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 8 W 4 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G710 MP10
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 3
  • GPU frequency 912 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 6 10
  • Shading units - 512
  • FLOPS - 1648 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 3750 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 60 Gbit/s
  • Max Size - 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) APU 580 (multi-core) MediaTek APU 590
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3200 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem R16-ready 5G modem -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8100

CPU
42%
GPU
38%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

CPU
49%
GPU
46%
Memory
44%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote