78

Points
Mediatek Helio G95
Overview - Dimensity 8100 Vs Helio G95

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8100 vs Helio G95 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8100 42
Helio G95 19
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8100 38
Helio G95 14
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8100 82
Helio G95 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8100 54
Helio G95 30
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8100 Helio G95
CPU 204875 91718
GPU 311503 91234
Memory 130636 58340
UX 161518 59442
Total score 808532 300734
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8100

  • Dimensity 8100 has 39.02% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (2850 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 1.33% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G95 (912 vs 900 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Helio G95 (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 58.33% smaller sized transistor than Helio G95 (5 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 168.85% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G95 (809 K vs 301 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8100 969
Helio G95 529

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8100 4081
Helio G95 1680

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G95 96.2

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G95 14.6

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G95 31.1

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G95 26.4

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G95 13.8

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G95 1.97

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G95 444.9

3DMark

Stability 94%

Graphics test 34 FPS
Stability 98%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display WQHD+ @120Hz / Full HD+ @168Hz Full HD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

75%
Turbo Clock Speed

2850 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 5 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 8 W 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G76 3EEMC4
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 912 MHz 900 MHz
  • Execution units 6 4
  • Shading units - 64
  • FLOPS - 195.8 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size - 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) APU 580 (multi-core) Da Vinci
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem R16-ready 5G modem -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 12
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8100

CPU
42%
GPU
38%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

Mediatek Helio G95

CPU
19%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote