Overview - Dimensity 900 Vs Dimensity 6080

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 900 vs Dimensity 6080 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 900 25
Dimensity 6080 27
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 900 19
Dimensity 6080 17
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 900 79
Dimensity 6080 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 900 41
Dimensity 6080 41
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 900 Dimensity 6080
CPU 125384 135946
GPU 125188 69519
Memory 83836 103763
UX 133752 121897
Total score 468160 431125
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 900

  • Dimensity 900 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 6080 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 900 has 8.59% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 6080 (468 K vs 431 K).

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 6080

  • Dimensity 6080 has 5.56% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 900 (950 vs 900 MHz).
  • Dimensity 6080 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 900.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 900 706
Dimensity 6080 778

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 900 2137
Dimensity 6080 2075

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 900 123.5
Dimensity 6080

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 900 20.5
Dimensity 6080

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 900 38.3
Dimensity 6080

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 900 33.1
Dimensity 6080

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 900 19.6
Dimensity 6080

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 900 2.51
Dimensity 6080

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 900 632.6
Dimensity 6080

3DMark

Stability 98%

Graphics test 12 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+@120Hz FHD+ @ 120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - 512 KB
  • L2 cache - 1 MB
  • L3 cache - 2 MB
  • Process 6 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count 10 Billion -
  • TDP 10 W 6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G57 MC2
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 1st gen
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz 950 MHz
  • Execution units 4 2
  • Shading units 48 64
  • FLOPS - 243.2 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 18.4 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 900

CPU
25%
GPU
19%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Dimensity 6080

CPU
27%
GPU
17%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote