Menu

43

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 920

Dimensity 920

55

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 8200

Dimensity 8200
Overview - Dimensity 920 Vs Dimensity 8200

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 920 vs Dimensity 8200 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 920 28
Dimensity 8200 41
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 920 21
Dimensity 8200 39
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 920 79
Dimensity 8200 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 920 43
Dimensity 8200 55
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 920 Dimensity 8200
CPU 139277 210639
GPU 128453 339646
Memory 96272 139322
UX 134315 160894
Total score 498317 850501
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200

  • Dimensity 8200 has 24% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 920 (3100 vs 2500 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 920 (6400 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 920 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 70.67% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 920 (851 K vs 498 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 920 792
Dimensity 8200 1054

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 920 2592
Dimensity 8200 4010

3DMark

10%
Dimensity 920
Stability 99%

Graphics test 12 FPS
N/A
Dimensity 8200
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120Hz 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10 HDR10+ Adaptive support
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

62%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

77%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A -
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 2 MB 4 MB
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 10 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G610 MC6
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 2
  • GPU frequency 950 MHz -
  • Execution units 4 6
  • Shading units 64 -
  • FLOPS 684 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.2
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 6400 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB -
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core)
  • Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 21
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 2770 Mbps 4700 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed 1200 Mbps -
  • 5G Upload Speed 2500 Mbps 2500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed 800 Mbps -
  • Wi-Fi 6 6E
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 920

Mediatek Dimensity 920
CPU
28%
GPU
21%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Mediatek Dimensity 8200

Mediatek Dimensity 8200
CPU
41%
GPU
39%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote