Overview - Snapdragon 768g Vs Dimensity 8050

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Snapdragon 768g vs Dimensity 8050 SoCs by Qualcomm and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 768g 25
Dimensity 8050 39
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Snapdragon 768g 19
Dimensity 8050 31
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 768g 75
Dimensity 8050 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Snapdragon 768g 40
Dimensity 8050 50
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Snapdragon 768g Dimensity 8050
CPU 126539 217200
GPU 116499 208098
Memory 84021 138670
UX 120080 138035
Total score 447139 702003
Key Differences

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 768g

  • Snapdragon 768g has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 8050.

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8050

  • Dimensity 8050 has 7.14% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 768g (3000 vs 2800 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8050 has 13.33% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 768g (850 vs 750 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8050 has 14.29% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 768g (6 vs 7 nm).
  • Dimensity 8050 has 57.00% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 768g (702 K vs 447 K ).
  • Dimensity 8050 Support 100.59% higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 768g (34.1 vs 17 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 768g 725
Dimensity 8050 964

Multi-Core Score

icon
Snapdragon 768g 2054
Dimensity 8050 3261

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 11 FPS
Stability 96%

Graphics test 27 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120 Hz, QHD+ @ 60 Hz QHD+ @ 90 Hz, FHD+ @ 168 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 3200 x 1800 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display 4K Ultra HD @ 60 Hz -
  • HDR HDR10+, HDR10 -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec. 2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

79%
Turbo Clock Speed

3000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)
    1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)
    6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55)
    1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 7 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 5 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Adreno 620 Mali-G77 MC9
  • Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 750 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 3 9
  • Shading units 192 144
  • FLOPS 700 Gigaflops 980 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 34.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 12 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 696 MediaTek APU 570
  • Storage type UFS 3.0 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 3200 x 1800 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem X52 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 19
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Qualcomm Snapdragon 768g

CPU
25%
GPU
19%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%

MediaTek Dimensity 8050

CPU
39%
GPU
31%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote