Menu

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 1330

Exynos 1330

78

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

Snapdragon 778G Plus
Overview - Exynos 1330 Vs Snapdragon 778G Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 778G Plus SoCs by Samsung and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 1330 28
Snapdragon 778G Plus 33
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 1330 19
Snapdragon 778G Plus 26
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 1330 82
Snapdragon 778G Plus 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 1330 43
Snapdragon 778G Plus 46
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 1330 Snapdragon 778G Plus
CPU 133870 166382
GPU 84349 177972
Memory 79108 106394
UX 117360 130486
Total score 414687 581234
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 1330

  • Exynos 1330 has 16.67% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 778G Plus (5 vs 6 nm).

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has 4.17% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 1330 (2500 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has 40.16% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 1330 (581 K vs 415 K ).
  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 1330.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1330 770
Snapdragon 778G Plus 816

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1330 2384
Snapdragon 778G Plus 2971

3DMark

0%
Exynos 1330
Stability %

Graphics test -
14%
Snapdragon 778G Plus
Stability %

Graphics test 16 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @120Hz FHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - 4K @ 60 Hz
  • HDR - HDR10+, HDR10
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
    3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 2 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 5 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali G68 MP2 Adreno 642L
  • Architecture Valhal 2 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency - 550 MHz
  • Execution units 2 2
  • Shading units - 384
  • FLOPS - 845 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 25.6 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 770
  • Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 192MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - X53
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 1330

Samsung Exynos 1330
CPU
28%
GPU
19%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
CPU
33%
GPU
26%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote