49

Points
Samsung Exynos 1480

90

Points
Apple A18 Pro
Overview - Exynos 1480 Vs Apple A18 Pro

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 1480 vs Apple A18 Pro SoCs by Samsung and Apple respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 1480 36
Apple A18 Pro 87
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 1480 25
Apple A18 Pro 94
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 1480 86
Apple A18 Pro 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 1480 49
Apple A18 Pro 90
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 1480 Apple A18 Pro
CPU 239966 475293
GPU 172430 719585
Memory 149766 259838
UX 159472 385136
Total score 721634 1839852
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences

Pros of Apple A18 Pro

  • Apple A18 Pro has 14.62% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 1480 (1490 vs 1300 MHz).
  • Apple A18 Pro has 17.19% higher memory frequency than Exynos 1480 (3750 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Apple A18 Pro has 25% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 1480 (3 vs 4 nm).
  • Apple A18 Pro has 154.96% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 1480 (1,840 K vs 722 K ).
  • Apple A18 Pro has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 1480.
  • Apple A18 Pro Support 17.19% higher memory bandwidth than Exynos 1480 (60 vs 51.2 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1480 1180
Apple A18 Pro 3342

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 1480 3536
Apple A18 Pro 8147

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - -
  • Max On-Display Resolution - -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

68%
Turbo Clock Speed

2750 MHz

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

100%
Base Frequency

4050 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 4.05 GHz – Everest
    4x 2.42 GHz – Sawtooth
  • Cores 8 6
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 16 MB
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 10 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name - Apple A18 Pro GPU
  • Architecture - Apple Bionic GPU
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1490 MHz
  • Execution units - -
  • Shading units - 128
  • FLOPS - 2289 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version - -
  • OpenCL version - -
  • DirectX version - -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3750 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 60 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 12 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Neural Engine
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 48MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, AIFF, CAF, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Snapdragon X75
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed - 10000 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - 3500 Mbps
  • 5G Upload Speed - 3500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - 1500 Mbps
  • Wi-Fi 6 7
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 1480

CPU
36%
GPU
25%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Apple A18 Pro

CPU
87%
GPU
94%
Memory
44%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote