78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2200

78

Points
Unisoc Tiger T700
Overview - Exynos 2200 Vs Tiger T700

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 2200 vs Tiger T700 SoCs by Samsung and Unisoc respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 2200 43
Tiger T700 14
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 2200 43
Tiger T700 9
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 2200 86
Tiger T700 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 2200 57
Tiger T700 27
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 2200 Tiger T700
CPU 223163 67140
GPU 391575 43026
Memory 175188 44785
UX 154579 58416
Total score 944505 213367
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200

  • Exynos 2200 has 53.85% higher CPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (2800 vs 1820 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 52.94% higher GPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (1300 vs 850 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 71.49% higher memory frequency than Tiger T700 (3200 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Exynos 2200 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Tiger T700 (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Exynos 2200 has 342.67% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tiger T700 (945 K vs 213 K).
  • Exynos 2200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Tiger T700.
  • Exynos 2200 Support 900.00% higher memory bandwidth than Tiger T700 (3000 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 1164
Tiger T700 355

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 2200 3570
Tiger T700 1349

Image compression

icon
Exynos 2200
Tiger T700 83.2

Face detection

icon
Exynos 2200
Tiger T700 9.85

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 2200
Tiger T700 23.9

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 2200
Tiger T700 18.5

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 2200
Tiger T700 9.6

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 2200
Tiger T700 1.37

SQLite

icon
Exynos 2200
Tiger T700 421.8

3DMark

Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - Full HD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2160 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

48%
Turbo Clock Speed

1820 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
    2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Mali-G52 MC2
  • Architecture RDNA 2 Bifrost 2
  • GPU frequency 1300 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 24 2
  • Shading units 384 32
  • FLOPS - 54.4 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.0
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 11
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 1866 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 24 GB 6 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2160 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 1K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 1080p at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - LTE Cat. 7
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 No
  • 5G support Yes -
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU
43%
GPU
43%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Unisoc Tiger T700

CPU
14%
GPU
9%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote