Menu

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 850

Exynos 850

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 7025

Dimensity 7025
Overview - Exynos 850 Vs Dimensity 7025

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Exynos 850 vs Dimensity 7025 SoCs by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Exynos 850 9
Dimensity 7025 33
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Exynos 850 6
Dimensity 7025 21
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Exynos 850 71
Dimensity 7025 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Exynos 850 29
Dimensity 7025 44
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Exynos 850 Dimensity 7025
CPU 47291 163789
GPU 21386 78876
Memory 40704 118764
UX 22040 135743
Total score 131421 497172
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7025

  • Dimensity 7025 has 15.85% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (950 vs 820 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7025 has 71.49% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (3200 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7025 has 25% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (6 vs 8 nm).
  • Dimensity 7025 has 278.30% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (497 K vs 131 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 150
Dimensity 7025 1028

Multi-Core Score

icon
Exynos 850 937
Dimensity 7025 2430

Image compression

icon
Exynos 850 74.3
Dimensity 7025

Face detection

icon
Exynos 850 10.4
Dimensity 7025

Speech recognition

icon
Exynos 850 16.7
Dimensity 7025

Machine learning

icon
Exynos 850 12.4
Dimensity 7025

Camera shooting

icon
Exynos 850 5.29
Dimensity 7025

HTML 5

icon
Exynos 850 1.38
Dimensity 7025

SQLite

icon
Exynos 850 356.2
Dimensity 7025

3DMark

3%
Exynos 850
Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
N/A
Dimensity 7025
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ Full HD+ @120Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 8 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - 10 Billion
  • TDP 3 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G52 MP1 IMG BXM-8-256
  • Architecture Bifrost PowerVR IMG GPU
  • GPU frequency 820 MHz 950 MHz
  • Execution units 6 8
  • Shading units 96 18
  • FLOPS 126 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1866 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) No Yes
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Samsung Exynos 850

Samsung Exynos 850
CPU
9%
GPU
6%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

MediaTek Dimensity 7025
CPU
33%
GPU
21%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote