78

Points
Unisoc Tiger T700

78

Points
HiSilicon Kirin 9010
Overview - Tiger T700 Vs Kirin 9010

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Tiger T700 vs Kirin 9010 SoCs by Unisoc and respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 12-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Tiger T700 14
Kirin 9010 55
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Tiger T700 9
Kirin 9010 38
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tiger T700 57
Kirin 9010 75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Tiger T700 27
Kirin 9010 56
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Tiger T700 Kirin 9010
CPU 67140 305156
GPU 43026 197179
Memory 44785 266091
UX 58416 201408
Total score 213367 969834
Key Differences

Pros of Unisoc Tiger T700

  • Tiger T700 has 13.33% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 9010 (850 vs 750 MHz).
  • Tiger T700 has latest instruction set, hence better than Kirin 9010.

Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9010

  • Kirin 9010 has 26.37% higher CPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (2300 vs 1820 MHz).
  • Kirin 9010 has 47.37% higher memory frequency than Tiger T700 (2750 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Kirin 9010 has 41.67% smaller sized transistor than Tiger T700 (7 vs 12 nm).
  • Kirin 9010 has 354.54% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tiger T700 (970 K vs 213 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Tiger T700 355
Kirin 9010 1442

Multi-Core Score

icon
Tiger T700 1349
Kirin 9010 4471

Image compression

icon
Tiger T700 83.2
Kirin 9010

Face detection

icon
Tiger T700 9.85
Kirin 9010

Speech recognition

icon
Tiger T700 23.9
Kirin 9010

Machine learning

icon
Tiger T700 18.5
Kirin 9010

Camera shooting

icon
Tiger T700 9.6
Kirin 9010

HTML 5

icon
Tiger T700 1.37
Kirin 9010

SQLite

icon
Tiger T700 421.8
Kirin 9010

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 90Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2160 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

48%
Turbo Clock Speed

1820 MHz

61%
Turbo Clock Speed

2300 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

70%
Base Frequency

1550 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.3 GHz – TaiShan V121
    4x 1.55 GHz – TaiShan V121
    6x 2.18 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 12
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 12 nm 7 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G52 MC2 Maleoon 910
  • Architecture Bifrost 2 Maleoon
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 750 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units 32 -
  • FLOPS 54.4 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.0 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 11 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1866 MHz 2750 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 44 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 6 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Da Vinci
  • Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2160 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 1K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem LTE Cat. 7 Balong 5000
  • 4G support No LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support - Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Unisoc Tiger T700

CPU
14%
GPU
9%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%

HiSilicon Kirin 9010

CPU
55%
GPU
38%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote