Menu

78

Points
Apple A14 Bionic

A14 Bionic

78

Points
Apple A17 Pro

A17 Pro
Overview - A14 Bionic Vs A17 Pro

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released A14 Bionic vs A17 Pro SoCs by Apple. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A14 Bionic 50
A17 Pro 94
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A14 Bionic 47
A17 Pro 95
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A14 Bionic 82
A17 Pro 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A14 Bionic 60
A17 Pro 93
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

A14 Bionic A17 Pro
CPU 203493 399992
GPU 284242 620081
Memory 131989 265579
UX 131211 346005
Total score 750935 1631657
Key Differences

Pros of Apple A17 Pro

  • A17 Pro has 21.94% higher CPU clock speed than A14 Bionic (3780 vs 3100 MHz).
  • A17 Pro has 50.02% higher memory frequency than A14 Bionic (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • A17 Pro has 40% smaller sized transistor than A14 Bionic (3 vs 5 nm).
  • A17 Pro has 117.28% better AnTuTu 9 score than A14 Bionic (1,632 K vs 751 K ).
  • A17 Pro has latest instruction set, hence better than A14 Bionic.
  • A17 Pro Support 50.15% higher memory bandwidth than A14 Bionic (51.2 vs 34.1 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
A14 Bionic 1611
A17 Pro 2999

Multi-Core Score

icon
A14 Bionic 4209
A17 Pro 7779

Image compression

icon
A14 Bionic 171.5
A17 Pro

Face detection

icon
A14 Bionic 33.6
A17 Pro

Speech recognition

icon
A14 Bionic 94.8
A17 Pro

Machine learning

icon
A14 Bionic 93.1
A17 Pro

Camera shooting

icon
A14 Bionic 38.7
A17 Pro

HTML 5

icon
A14 Bionic 4.5
A17 Pro

SQLite

icon
A14 Bionic 1060
A17 Pro

3DMark

43%
A14 Bionic
Stability 77%

Graphics test 50 FPS
51%
A17 Pro
Stability 79%

Graphics test 60 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ (2.7K) @ 60Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2732 x 2048 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

100%
Turbo Clock Speed

3780 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

92%
Base Frequency

2020 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
    4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
     2x 3.78 GHz
    4x 2.02 GHz
  • Cores 6 6
  • Instruction set ARMv8.5-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache 128 KB 256 KB
  • L2 cache 8 MB 16 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 5 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count 11.8 Billion 19 Billion
  • TDP 6 W 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Apple A14 GPU Apple A17 GPU
  • Architecture - Apple GPU
  • GPU frequency - 1398 MHz
  • Execution units 4 6
  • Shading units - 128
  • FLOPS 998 Gigaflops 2147.2 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version - -
  • OpenCL version - -
  • DirectX version - -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 34.1 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 6 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Neural Engine Neural Engine
  • Storage type NVMe NVMe
  • Max display resolution 2732 x 2048
  • Max camera resolution
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 -
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.0 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Apple A14 Bionic

Apple A14 Bionic
CPU
50%
GPU
47%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

Apple A17 Pro

Apple A17 Pro
CPU
94%
GPU
95%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote