We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
A16 Bionic chip vs Dimensity 8050 SoCs by
Apple and Mediatek
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
6-core
and 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A16 Bionic chip61
Dimensity 805039
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A16 Bionic chip62
Dimensity 805031
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A16 Bionic chip86
Dimensity 805079
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A16 Bionic chip70
Dimensity 805050
SoC
A16 Bionic chip
VS
Dimensity 8050
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
A16 Bionic chip
Dimensity 8050
CPU
247110
217200
GPU
408357
208098
Memory
162944
138670
UX
146541
138035
Total score
964952
702003
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
A16 Bionic chip has
15.33%
higher CPU clock speed than
Dimensity 8050 (3460 vs
3000 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
64.47%
higher GPU clock speed than
Dimensity 8050 (1398 vs
850 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
200.05%
higher memory frequency than
Dimensity 8050 (6400 vs
2133 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
33.33%
smaller sized transistor than
Dimensity 8050 (4 vs
6 nm).
A16 Bionic chip has
37.46%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Dimensity 8050 (965 K
vs
702 K).
A16 Bionic chip has latest instruction set, hence
better than
Dimensity 8050.