We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
A16 Bionic chip vs Snapdragon 685 SoCs by
Apple and Qualcomm
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
6-core
and 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A16 Bionic chip58
Snapdragon 68516
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A16 Bionic chip57
Snapdragon 68510
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A16 Bionic chip86
Snapdragon 68579
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A16 Bionic chip67
Snapdragon 68535
SoC
A16 Bionic chip
VS
Snapdragon 685
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
A16 Bionic chip
Snapdragon 685
CPU
247110
81894
GPU
408357
39122
Memory
162944
77991
UX
146541
71216
Total score
964952
270223
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
A16 Bionic chip has
23.57%
higher CPU clock speed than
Snapdragon 685 (3460 vs
2800 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
200.05%
higher memory frequency than
Snapdragon 685 (6400 vs
2133 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
33.33%
smaller sized transistor than
Snapdragon 685 (4 vs
6 nm).
A16 Bionic chip has
257.09%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Snapdragon 685 (965 K
vs
270 K).
A16 Bionic chip has latest instruction set, hence
better than
Snapdragon 685.