We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
A16 Bionic chip vs Snapdragon 690 SoCs by
Apple and Qualcomm
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
6-core
and 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A16 Bionic chip51
Snapdragon 69018
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A16 Bionic chip54
Snapdragon 69012
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A16 Bionic chip86
Snapdragon 69071
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A16 Bionic chip64
Snapdragon 69034
SoC
A16 Bionic chip
VS
Snapdragon 690
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
A16 Bionic chip
Snapdragon 690
CPU
247110
110385
GPU
408357
76645
Memory
162944
63724
UX
146541
94636
Total score
964952
345390
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
A16 Bionic chip has
73.00%
higher CPU clock speed than
Snapdragon 690 (3460 vs
2000 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
47.16%
higher GPU clock speed than
Snapdragon 690 (1398 vs
950 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
200.05%
higher memory frequency than
Snapdragon 690 (6400 vs
2133 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
50%
smaller sized transistor than
Snapdragon 690 (4 vs
8 nm).
A16 Bionic chip has
179.38%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Snapdragon 690 (965 K
vs
345 K).
A16 Bionic chip has latest instruction set, hence
better than
Snapdragon 690.