We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
A16 Bionic chip vs Snapdragon 695 SoCs by
Apple and Qualcomm
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
6-core
and 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A16 Bionic chip61
Snapdragon 69523
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A16 Bionic chip62
Snapdragon 69517
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A16 Bionic chip86
Snapdragon 69579
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A16 Bionic chip70
Snapdragon 69540
SoC
A16 Bionic chip
VS
Snapdragon 695
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
A16 Bionic chip
Snapdragon 695
CPU
247110
115765
GPU
408357
93638
Memory
162944
60715
UX
146541
101282
Total score
964952
371400
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
A16 Bionic chip has
57.27%
higher CPU clock speed than
Snapdragon 695 (3460 vs
2200 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
66.43%
higher GPU clock speed than
Snapdragon 695 (1398 vs
840 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
200.05%
higher memory frequency than
Snapdragon 695 (6400 vs
2133 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
33.33%
smaller sized transistor than
Snapdragon 695 (4 vs
6 nm).
A16 Bionic chip has
159.81%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Snapdragon 695 (965 K
vs
371 K).
A16 Bionic chip has latest instruction set, hence
better than
Snapdragon 695.