We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
A16 Bionic chip vs Snapdragon 765G SoCs by
Apple and Qualcomm
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
6-core
and 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A16 Bionic chip58
Snapdragon 765G20
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A16 Bionic chip57
Snapdragon 765G15
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A16 Bionic chip86
Snapdragon 765G75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A16 Bionic chip67
Snapdragon 765G37
SoC
A16 Bionic chip
VS
Snapdragon 765G
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
A16 Bionic chip
Snapdragon 765G
CPU
247110
103525
GPU
408357
93952
Memory
162944
65499
UX
146541
63810
Total score
964952
326786
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
A16 Bionic chip has
44.17%
higher CPU clock speed than
Snapdragon 765G (3460 vs
2400 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
86.40%
higher GPU clock speed than
Snapdragon 765G (1398 vs
750 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
200.05%
higher memory frequency than
Snapdragon 765G (6400 vs
2133 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
42.86%
smaller sized transistor than
Snapdragon 765G (4 vs
7 nm).
A16 Bionic chip has
195.29%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Snapdragon 765G (965 K
vs
327 K).
A16 Bionic chip has latest instruction set, hence
better than
Snapdragon 765G.