We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
A16 Bionic chip vs Exynos 1280 SoCs by
Apple and Samsung
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
6-core
and 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A16 Bionic chip61
Exynos 128024
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A16 Bionic chip63
Exynos 128018
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A16 Bionic chip86
Exynos 128082
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A16 Bionic chip70
Exynos 128041
SoC
A16 Bionic chip
VS
Exynos 1280
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
A16 Bionic chip has
44.17%
higher CPU clock speed than
Exynos 1280 (3460 vs
2400 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
39.80%
higher GPU clock speed than
Exynos 1280 (1398 vs
1000 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
200.05%
higher memory frequency than
Exynos 1280 (6400 vs
2133 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
20%
smaller sized transistor than
Exynos 1280 (4 vs
5 nm).
A16 Bionic chip has
135.11%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Exynos 1280 (965 K
vs
410 K).
A16 Bionic chip has latest instruction set, hence
better than
Exynos 1280.