Menu

64

Points
Apple A16 Bionic

A16 Bionic chip

52

Points
Samsung Exynos 2200

Exynos 2200
Overview - A16 Bionic chip Vs Exynos 2200

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released A16 Bionic chip vs Exynos 2200 SoCs by Apple and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 6-core and 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A16 Bionic chip 51
Exynos 2200 36
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A16 Bionic chip 54
Exynos 2200 34
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A16 Bionic chip 86
Exynos 2200 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A16 Bionic chip 64
Exynos 2200 52
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

A16 Bionic chip Exynos 2200
CPU 247110 223163
GPU 408357 391575
Memory 162944 175188
UX 146541 154579
Total score 964952 944505
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences

Pros of Apple A16 Bionic

  • A16 Bionic chip has 23.57% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 (3460 vs 2800 MHz).
  • A16 Bionic chip has 7.54% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 (1398 vs 1300 MHz).
  • A16 Bionic chip has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Exynos 2200 (6400 vs 3200 MHz).
  • A16 Bionic chip has 2.16% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 2200 (965 K vs 945 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
A16 Bionic chip 1870
Exynos 2200 1164

Multi-Core Score

icon
A16 Bionic chip 5474
Exynos 2200 3570

Image compression

icon
A16 Bionic chip 243.5
Exynos 2200

Face detection

icon
A16 Bionic chip 46.4
Exynos 2200

Speech recognition

icon
A16 Bionic chip 141.8
Exynos 2200

Machine learning

icon
A16 Bionic chip 117.1
Exynos 2200

Camera shooting

icon
A16 Bionic chip 54.3
Exynos 2200

HTML 5

icon
A16 Bionic chip 5.9
Exynos 2200

SQLite

icon
A16 Bionic chip 1430
Exynos 2200

3DMark

51%
A16 Bionic chip
Stability 79%

Graphics test 59 FPS
33%
Exynos 2200
Stability 59%

Graphics test 39 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - -
  • Max On-Display Resolution - -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

86%
Turbo Clock Speed

3460 MHz

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

50%
Base Frequency

2020 MHz

45%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 3.46 GHz – Everest
    4x 2.02 GHz – Sawtooth
     1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 6 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache 256 KB -
  • L2 cache 16 MB -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 16 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Apple A16 GPU Samsung Xclipse 920
  • Architecture Apple GPU RDNA 2
  • GPU frequency 1398 MHz 1300 MHz
  • Execution units 6 24
  • Shading units 768 384
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version - 1.1
  • OpenCL version - 2.0
  • DirectX version - 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Neural Engine Yes
  • Storage type NVMe UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2796 x 1290 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+ AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 7500 Mbps 7526 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - 3000 Mbps
  • 5G Upload Speed 3500 Mbps 3758 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - 422 Mbps
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Apple A16 Bionic

Apple A16 Bionic
CPU
51%
GPU
54%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Samsung Exynos 2200

Samsung Exynos 2200
CPU
36%
GPU
34%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

FAQ - Which Processor is Better?

Which processor is better in Turbo Frequency between A16 Bionic chip and Exynos 2200?

The processor with the higher Turbo Frequency is: A16 Bionic chip with a 23.57% higher clock speed (3460 MHz vs 2800 MHz).

Which processor is better in GPU Frequency between A16 Bionic chip and Exynos 2200?

The processor with the higher GPU Frequency is: A16 Bionic chip with a 7.54% higher GPU clock speed (1398 MHz vs 1300 MHz).

Which processor is better in Memory Frequency between A16 Bionic chip and Exynos 2200?

The processor with the higher Memory Frequency is: A16 Bionic chip with a 100.00% higher memory frequency (6400 MHz vs 3200 MHz).

Which processor has a better AnTuTu score between A16 Bionic chip and Exynos 2200?

The processor with the better AnTuTu score is: A16 Bionic chip with a 2.16% better score (964952 vs 944505).

Choose between two processors

Cast your vote

Total Votes: 0