We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
A16 Bionic chip vs Exynos 2200 SoCs by
Apple and Samsung
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
6-core
and 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
A16 Bionic chip51
Exynos 220036
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
A16 Bionic chip54
Exynos 220034
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
A16 Bionic chip86
Exynos 220086
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
A16 Bionic chip64
Exynos 220052
SoC
A16 Bionic chip
VS
Exynos 2200
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
A16 Bionic chip
Exynos 2200
CPU
247110
223163
GPU
408357
391575
Memory
162944
175188
UX
146541
154579
Total score
964952
944505
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
A16 Bionic chip has
23.57%
higher CPU clock speed than
Exynos 2200 (3460 vs
2800 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
7.54%
higher GPU clock speed than
Exynos 2200 (1398 vs
1300 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
100.00%
higher memory frequency than
Exynos 2200 (6400 vs
3200 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
2.16%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Exynos 2200 (965 K
vs
945 K).