Menu

78

Points
Google Tensor G2

Tensor G2

78

Points
Google Tensor

Tensor
Overview - Tensor G2 Vs Tensor

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Tensor G2 vs Tensor SoCs by Google. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Tensor G2 39
Tensor 36
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Tensor G2 36
Tensor 34
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tensor G2 82
Tensor 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Tensor G2 52
Tensor 51
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Tensor G2 Tensor
CPU 203226 181161
GPU 298514 294446
Memory 114682 103174
UX 157662 145388
Total score 774084 724169
Key Differences

Pros of Google Tensor G2

  • Tensor G2 has 1.79% higher CPU clock speed than Tensor (2850 vs 2800 MHz).
  • Tensor G2 has 0.24% higher GPU clock speed than Tensor (850 vs 848 MHz).
  • Tensor G2 has 6.89% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tensor (774 K vs 724 K).
  • Tensor G2 has latest instruction set, hence better than Tensor.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Tensor G2 1059
Tensor 1026

Multi-Core Score

icon
Tensor G2 3251
Tensor 2879

Image compression

icon
Tensor G2 168.3
Tensor

Face detection

icon
Tensor G2 24.5
Tensor

Speech recognition

icon
Tensor G2 69.4
Tensor

Machine learning

icon
Tensor G2 71.2
Tensor

Camera shooting

icon
Tensor G2 31.2
Tensor

HTML 5

icon
Tensor G2 2.97
Tensor

SQLite

icon
Tensor G2 1010
Tensor

3DMark

33%
Tensor G2
Stability 72%

Graphics test 38 FPS
32%
Tensor
Stability 56%

Graphics test 37 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Ultra HD(4K) 4k, FHD+ @ 60 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+, HDR HDR
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

75%
Turbo Clock Speed

2850 MHz

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
    2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
     2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
    2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 3 MB
  • L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
  • Process 5 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 7 W 5.6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G710 MP7 Mali-G78 MP20
  • Architecture Valhall 3 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 848 MHz
  • Execution units 7 20
  • Shading units 112 320
  • FLOPS 1153 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit Tensor Processing Unit
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Exynos 5300g Exynos 5300g
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Google Tensor G2

Google Tensor G2
CPU
39%
GPU
36%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

Google Tensor

Google Tensor
CPU
36%
GPU
34%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote