55

Points
Google Tensor G3

90

Points
Apple A18 Pro
Overview - Tensor G3 Vs Apple A18 Pro

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Tensor G3 vs Apple A18 Pro SoCs by Google and Apple respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 9-core and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Tensor G3 43
Apple A18 Pro 87
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Tensor G3 36
Apple A18 Pro 94
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tensor G3 86
Apple A18 Pro 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Tensor G3 55
Apple A18 Pro 90
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Tensor G3 Apple A18 Pro
CPU 281756 475293
GPU 364449 719585
Memory 148341 259838
UX 181913 385136
Total score 976459 1839852
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences

Pros of Google Tensor G3

  • Tensor G3 has 12.00% higher memory frequency than Apple A18 Pro (4200 vs 3750 MHz).

Pros of Apple A18 Pro

  • Apple A18 Pro has 67.42% higher GPU clock speed than Tensor G3 (1490 vs 890 MHz).
  • Apple A18 Pro has 25% smaller sized transistor than Tensor G3 (3 vs 4 nm).
  • Apple A18 Pro has 88.42% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tensor G3 (1,840 K vs 976 K ).
  • Apple A18 Pro has latest instruction set, hence better than Tensor G3.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Tensor G3 1626
Apple A18 Pro 3342

Multi-Core Score

icon
Tensor G3 3598
Apple A18 Pro 8147

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 4K -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 3840 x 2160 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

72%
Turbo Clock Speed

2910 MHz

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

42%
Base Frequency

1700 MHz

100%
Base Frequency

4050 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
    4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
    2x 4.05 GHz – Everest
    4x 2.42 GHz – Sawtooth
  • Cores 9 6
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9.2-A-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 16 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 4 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 6 W 10 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G715 MP7 Apple A18 Pro GPU
  • Architecture Valhall 4th gen Apple Bionic GPU
  • GPU frequency 890 MHz 1490 MHz
  • Execution units 7 -
  • Shading units 192 128
  • FLOPS 2415.8 Gigaflops 2289 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.3 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version - -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 4200 MHz 3750 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 64 Gbit/s 60 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Neural Engine
  • Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 NVMe
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 48MP
  • Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, AIFF, CAF, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Exynos 5300i Snapdragon X75
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 7300 Mbps 10000 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - 3500 Mbps
  • 5G Upload Speed 3700 Mbps 3500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - 1500 Mbps
  • Wi-Fi 7 7
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Google Tensor G3

CPU
43%
GPU
36%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Apple A18 Pro

CPU
87%
GPU
94%
Memory
44%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote