We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
Kirin 9000 vs A14 Bionic SoCs by
Hisilicon and Apple
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
8-core
and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 900041
A14 Bionic50
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 900036
A14 Bionic48
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 900086
A14 Bionic82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 900054
A14 Bionic60
SoC
Kirin 9000
VS
A14 Bionic
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
Kirin 9000
A14 Bionic
CPU
194527
203493
GPU
280796
284242
Memory
146761
131989
UX
140303
131211
Total score
762387
750935
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Hisilicon Kirin 9000
Kirin 9000 has
0.97%
higher CPU clock speed than
A14 Bionic (3130 vs
3100 MHz).
Kirin 9000 has
28.93%
higher memory frequency than
A14 Bionic (2750 vs
2133 MHz).
Kirin 9000 has
20%
smaller sized transistor than
A14 Bionic (4 vs
5 nm).
Kirin 9000 has
1.53%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
A14 Bionic (762 K
vs
751 K).
Kirin 9000 Support
29.03%
higher memory bandwidth than
A14 Bionic (44 vs
34.1 MHz).
Pros of Apple A14 Bionic
A14 Bionic has latest
instruction set,
hence better than
Kirin 9000.