We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
Kirin 9000 vs A16 Bionic chip SoCs by
Hisilicon and Apple
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
8-core
and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 900034
A16 Bionic chip51
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 900028
A16 Bionic chip54
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 900086
A16 Bionic chip86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 900049
A16 Bionic chip64
SoC
Kirin 9000
VS
A16 Bionic chip
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
Kirin 9000
A16 Bionic chip
CPU
194527
247110
GPU
280796
408357
Memory
146761
162944
UX
140303
146541
Total score
762387
964952
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
A16 Bionic chip has
10.54%
higher CPU clock speed than
Kirin 9000 (3460 vs
3130 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
83.95%
higher GPU clock speed than
Kirin 9000 (1398 vs
760 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
132.73%
higher memory frequency than
Kirin 9000 (6400 vs
2750 MHz).
A16 Bionic chip has
26.57%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Kirin 9000 (965 K vs
762 K ).
A16 Bionic chip has latest
instruction set,
hence better than
Kirin 9000.
A16 Bionic chip Support
16.36%
higher memory bandwidth than
Kirin 9000 (51.2 vs
44 GB/s).